Display options
Share it on

J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:674230. doi: 10.1155/2013/674230. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Three-Dimensional Multidetector CT for Anatomic Evaluation of Orbital Tumors.

Journal of ophthalmology

J Matthew Debnam, Rory R Mayer, Bita Esmaeli, Jeffrey S Weinberg, Franco Demonte, Nandita Guha-Thakurta

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1482, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

PMID: 24288594 PMCID: PMC3833199 DOI: 10.1155/2013/674230

Abstract

Intricate resection and complex reconstructive procedures often required for primary and metastatic orbital tumors are facilitated by accurate imaging. A three-dimensional (3D) image can be reconstructed from source axial multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images to visualize orbital tumors. To assess the utility of 3D images in this setting, the 3D images were reconstructed retrospectively for 20 patients with an orbital tumor and compared to two-dimensional (2D) orthogonal MDCT studies. Both types of images were assessed for their capacity to show the bony orbital walls and foramina, extraocular muscles, and optic nerve in the orbit contralateral to the tumor and, in the affected orbit, the extent of the tumor and its relationship to normal orbital contents and associated bone destruction. 3D imaging is most informative when axial images are acquired at 1.25 mm collimation. The optic nerve, extraocular muscles, and well-circumscribed orbital tumors were well visualized on 3D images. On 3D imaging, tumor-associated destruction of the lateral and superior orbital walls was fairly well demonstrated and that of the inferior and medial walls was not. The 3D images provide the surgeon with a comprehensive view of well-circumscribed orbital tumors and its relationship to extraocular muscles, exiting foramina, and the superior and lateral walls.

References

  1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008 Oct;44(4):273-6 - PubMed
  2. Neurosurg Focus. 2001 May 15;10(5):E3 - PubMed
  3. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;19(4):275-81 - PubMed
  4. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):212-20 - PubMed
  5. Neurosurgery. 1996 Jun;38(6):1105-12; discussion 1112-3 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosurg. 2002 Oct;97(4):851-6 - PubMed
  7. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2005 Feb;122(1):27-31 - PubMed
  8. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov-Dec;26(6):403-8 - PubMed
  9. Head Neck. 2008 Feb;30(2):242-50 - PubMed
  10. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982 Feb;17(1):3-9 - PubMed
  11. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010 Dec;9(4):323-8 - PubMed
  12. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;44(2):395-410 - PubMed
  13. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;22(5):366-70 - PubMed
  14. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975 Jan;79(1):53-5 - PubMed
  15. Ann Plast Surg. 2000 May;44(5):553-62; discussion 562-3 - PubMed
  16. Radiographics. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):721-40 - PubMed
  17. Radiographics. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):135-50 - PubMed
  18. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Oct;104(10):1477-82 - PubMed
  19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug;268(8):1163-1167 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):224-9 - PubMed
  21. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;20(1):22-6 - PubMed
  22. Neurosurg Focus. 2001 May 15;10(5):E2 - PubMed
  23. Radiographics. 2008 Oct;28(6):1771-84 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support