Display options
Share it on

Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Oct 31;5:77-80. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S53359. eCollection 2013.

Effect of lip position and gingival display on smile and esthetics as perceived by college students with different educational backgrounds.

Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry

Khalid H Zawawi, Ghadah A Malki, Mohammad S Al-Zahrani, Yaser M Alkhiary

Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Dental Science, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

PMID: 24204173 PMCID: PMC3816985 DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S53359

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of education on the perception of female college students on the effect of lip position and gingival display upon smiling and esthetics.

METHODS: A photograph of a smiling subject was altered to show varying degrees of gingival display. Female students, who were studying in different colleges, assessed a total of five images, using a numerical rating scale.

RESULTS: A total of 440 college students from eight educational faculties (dentistry, dental assistants, medicine, medical technology, nursing, science, arts, and pharmacology) participated in this study. There was no difference found between students' ratings of the altered images (P<0.05). The perception of a gummy smile was found to be similar among the participants. There was agreement between all participants that 2 mm of gingival display was the most attractive smile, while a 4 mm covering of the teeth by the upper lip was the least attractive.

CONCLUSION: Educational influence did not have an effect of the perception of a gummy smile.

Keywords: educational background; gingival display; gummy smile; perception; smile; smile esthetic

References

  1. Eur J Orthod. 2002 Apr;24(2):199-204 - PubMed
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Jan;51(1):24-8 - PubMed
  3. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):141-51 - PubMed
  4. Dent Update. 2007 Apr;34(3):152-4, 157-8 - PubMed
  5. J Oral Rehabil. 1995 Aug;22(8):549-56 - PubMed
  6. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):429-34 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009 Winter;4(4):382-95 - PubMed
  8. Angle Orthod. 1992 Summer;62(2):91-100; discussion 101-2 - PubMed
  9. J Prosthodont. 2010 Jun;19(4):286-93 - PubMed
  10. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:45-58 - PubMed
  11. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999 Jun-Jul;11(5):639-44; quiz 646 - PubMed
  12. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):311-24 - PubMed
  13. Spec Care Dentist. 1999 Mar-Apr;19(2):84-8 - PubMed
  14. Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):778-84 - PubMed
  15. Quintessence Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;40(10):809-18 - PubMed
  16. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Dec;138(12):1544-53; quiz 1613-4 - PubMed
  17. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jan;25(1):7-14 - PubMed

Publication Types