Display options
Cite
Elliott RM, Tintle SM, Levin LS. Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(1):83-8doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x.
Elliott, R. M., Tintle, S. M., & Levin, L. S. (2014). Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 7(1), 83-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x
Elliott, River M, et al. "Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field." Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine vol. 7,1 (2014): 83-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x
Elliott RM, Tintle SM, Levin LS. Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014 Mar;7(1):83-8. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x. PMID: 24241894; PMCID: PMC4094126.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014 Mar;7(1):83-8. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x.

Upper extremity transplantation: current concepts and challenges in an emerging field.

Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine

River M Elliott, Scott M Tintle, L Scott Levin

Affiliations

  1. The Curtis National Hand Center, 3333 North Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA.

PMID: 24241894 PMCID: PMC4094126 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-013-9191-x

Abstract

Loss of an isolated upper limb is an emotionally and physically devastating event that results in significant impairment. Patients who lose both upper extremities experience profound disability that affects nearly every aspect of their lives. While prosthetics and surgery can eventually provide the single limb amputee with a suitable assisting hand, limited utility, minimal haptic feedback, weight, and discomfort are persistent problems with these techniques that contribute to high rates of prosthetic rejection. Moreover, despite ongoing advances in prosthetic technology, bilateral amputees continue to experience high levels of dependency, disability, and distress. Hand and upper extremity transplantation holds several advantages over prosthetic rehabilitation. The missing limb is replaced with one of similar skin color and size. Sensibility, voluntary motor control, and proprioception are restored to a greater degree, and afford better dexterity and function than prosthetics. The main shortcomings of transplantation include the hazards of immunosuppression, the complications of rejection and its treatment, and high cost. Hand and upper limb transplantation represents the most commonly performed surgery in the growing field of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA). As upper limb transplantation and VCA have become more widespread, several important challenges and controversies have emerged. These include: refining indications for transplantation, optimizing immunosuppression, establishing reliable criteria for monitoring, diagnosing, and treating rejection, and standardizing outcome measures. This article will summarize the historical background of hand transplantation and review the current literature and concepts surrounding it.

References

  1. J Hand Surg Br. 1988 May;13(2):177-80 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 24;339(26):1905-13 - PubMed
  3. Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):495-8 - PubMed
  4. Microsurgery. 2006;26(3):144-9; discussion 149-50 - PubMed
  5. Surgery. 1999 Aug;126(2):384-8 - PubMed
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971 May;47(5):425-31 - PubMed
  7. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 17;343(7):468-73 - PubMed
  8. Transplant Proc. 2010 Nov;42(9):3347-53 - PubMed
  9. Transplantation. 2001 Apr 15;71(7):827-35 - PubMed
  10. Transplantation. 2010 Dec 27;90(12):1590-4 - PubMed
  11. J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Nov;36(11):1862-7 - PubMed
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 May;107(6):1419-29 - PubMed
  13. Transplant Bull. 1960 Apr;7:418-21 - PubMed
  14. Hand Clin. 2011 Nov;27(4):405-9, vii - PubMed
  15. Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):463-5 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 1994 Jul 16;344(8916):151-5 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 1999 Apr 17;353(9161):1315-20 - PubMed
  18. Semin Plast Surg. 2010 Feb;24(1):11-7 - PubMed
  19. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Jun;33(3):358-62 - PubMed
  20. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(6):570-80 - PubMed
  21. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Oct;37(10):2126-35 - PubMed
  22. Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):1085-90 - PubMed
  23. Transplant Proc. 1976 Jun;8(2 Suppl 1):119-27 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):168-70 - PubMed
  25. Hand (N Y). 2009 Sep;4(3):239-44 - PubMed
  26. Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):491-4 - PubMed
  27. Transplantation. 1998 Dec 27;66(12):1581-7 - PubMed
  28. Neurosci Lett. 2002 Sep 20;330(2):147-50 - PubMed
  29. J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Jul;20(4):619-22 - PubMed
  30. Lancet. 2003 May 3;361(9368):1502-10 - PubMed
  31. Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):345-51 - PubMed
  32. Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):472-5 - PubMed
  33. Ann Surg. 1967 Oct;166(4):624-9 - PubMed
  34. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jul;6(7):1718-24 - PubMed
  35. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Sep;33(7):1039-47 - PubMed
  36. Transplantation. 1993 Oct;56(4):911-7 - PubMed

Publication Types