Display options
Share it on

Pharmaceutics. 2011 Aug 11;3(3):485-96. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics3030485.

A computational procedure for assessing the dynamic performance of diffusion-controlled transdermal delivery devices.

Pharmaceutics

Laurent Simon

Affiliations

  1. Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark NJ 07102, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 24310592 PMCID: PMC3857078 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics3030485

Abstract

The dynamic performances of two different controlled-release systems were analyzed. In a reservoir-type drug-delivery patch, the transdermal flux is influenced by the properties of the membrane. A constant thermodynamic drug activity is preserved in the donor compartment. Monolithic matrices are among the most inexpensive systems used to direct drug delivery. In these structures, the active pharmaceutical ingredients are encapsulated within a polymeric material. Despite the popularity of these two devices, to tailor the properties of the polymer and additives to specific transient behaviors can be challenging and time-consuming. The heuristic approaches often considered to select the vehicle formulation provide limited insight into key permeation mechanisms making it difficult to predict the device performance. In this contribution, a method to calculate the flux response time in a system consisting of a reservoir and a polymeric membrane was proposed and confirmed. Nearly 8.60 h passed before the metoprolol delivery rate reached ninety-eight percent of its final value. An expression was derived for the time it took to transport the active pharmaceutical ingredient out of the polymer. Ninety-eight percent of alpha-tocopherol acetate was released in 461.4 h following application to the skin. The effective time constant can be computed to help develop optimum design strategies.

References

  1. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Jun 11;48(2-3):159-72 - PubMed
  2. J Pharm Sci. 2002 Mar;91(3):810-21 - PubMed
  3. Int J Pharm. 2002 Nov 6;248(1-2):81-92 - PubMed
  4. Curr Drug Deliv. 2011 Mar;8(2):144-51 - PubMed
  5. J Pharm Sci. 2002 Mar;91(3):822-44 - PubMed
  6. J Cosmet Sci. 2005 Mar-Apr;56(2):91-103 - PubMed
  7. Physiol Res. 2002;51(3):285-90 - PubMed
  8. J Pharm Sci. 1995 Feb;84(2):158-60 - PubMed
  9. Math Biosci. 2007 Oct;209(2):593-607 - PubMed
  10. Int J Pharm. 2011 Oct 10;418(1):130-41 - PubMed

Publication Types