Display options
Share it on

J Genet Couns. 1993 Dec;2(4):275-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00961576.

Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain.

Journal of genetic counseling

C G Palmer, F Sainfort

Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Ave., 53706, Madison, Wisconsin.

PMID: 24242749 DOI: 10.1007/BF00961576

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it provides an historical overview of studies of risk, risk perception, and decision making under risk within the genetic counseling domain. Second, it proposes an alternative conceptualization and operationalization for the study of risk perception. The conceptualization involves probability, adversity, incompleteness, and ambiguity. Prior studies of risk perception focus on the recurrence risk and operationalize risk perception by asking for interpretations of the magnitude of the probability of the outcome. Their focus is on the probability of a particular outcome. We formulate the problem in terms of a gamble and suggest that risk perception be operationalized in terms of the riskiness of the gamble. Our focus is on the riskiness of a decision option which entails two or more outcomes.

References

  1. Am J Public Health. 1972 Nov;62(11):1489-92 - PubMed
  2. Br Med J. 1973 Mar 24;1(5855):724-6 - PubMed
  3. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Apr;35(4):503-9 - PubMed
  4. J Med Genet. 1973 Jun;10(2):129-34 - PubMed
  5. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1987;23(2):61-83 - PubMed
  6. Am J Med Genet. 1985 Mar;20(3):491-504 - PubMed
  7. Soc Biol. 1974 Winter;21(4):332-9 - PubMed
  8. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(5C):355-67 - PubMed
  9. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Oct 23;115(8):749-52 - PubMed
  10. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Oct;28(2):361-70 - PubMed
  11. Br Med J. 1979 May 12;1(6173):1253-6 - PubMed
  12. Am J Med Genet. 1979;4(1):73-87 - PubMed
  13. Soc Biol. 1986 Spring-Summer;33(1-2):57-64 - PubMed
  14. Clin Genet. 1972;3(2):147-50 - PubMed
  15. Am J Public Health. 1987 Mar;77(3):288-90 - PubMed
  16. Am J Med Genet. 1989 May;33(1):130-5 - PubMed
  17. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Sep 1;44(1):104-11 - PubMed
  18. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(2):123-35 - PubMed
  19. Clin Genet. 1990 Oct;38(4):295-306 - PubMed
  20. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1987;23(2):115-49 - PubMed
  21. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Aug;39(2):253-64 - PubMed
  22. Br Med J. 1962 Mar 3;1(5278):587-92 - PubMed
  23. Clin Genet. 1988 Dec;34(6):352-65 - PubMed
  24. Am J Med Genet. 1979;3(2):113-27 - PubMed
  25. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1970 May;6(1):7-12 - PubMed
  26. Soc Biol. 1980 Fall;27(3):167-85 - PubMed
  27. Clin Genet. 1989 Oct;36(4):209-16 - PubMed
  28. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(5C):325-39 - PubMed
  29. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Apr;35(4):496-502 - PubMed
  30. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 1971 Feb 6;1(7693):281-5 - PubMed
  32. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(5C):341-54 - PubMed
  33. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1987;23(2):227-50 - PubMed
  34. Am J Med Genet. 1979;4(1):51-71 - PubMed
  35. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1987;23(2):171-207 - PubMed
  36. Clin Genet. 1974;5(3):177-87 - PubMed
  37. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 31;287(9):433-9 - PubMed

Publication Types