Display options
Share it on

Planta. 1982 Nov;156(2):158-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00395430.

Proteolysis alters the spectral properties of 124 kdalton phytochrome from Avena.

Planta

R D Vierstra, P H Quail

Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, WI, USA.

PMID: 24272311 DOI: 10.1007/BF00395430

Abstract

Native phytochrome from Avena sativa L. is homogeneous with a monomeric molecular weight of 124 kdalton; 6-10 kdalton larger than the heterogeneous "120" kdalton preparations previously considered to be undegraded (Vierstra and Quail, 1982, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79: 5272-5276). The phototransformation difference spectrum (Pr-Pfr) of 124 kdalton phytochrome measured in crude extracts has a minimum in the farred region at 730 nm, the same as that observed in vivo. These spectral properties contrast with those of "120" kdalton phytochrome purified by column immunoaffinity chromatography where the difference minimum is at 724 nm. When 124 kdalton phytochrome is incubated as Pr in crude extracts, the difference minimum shifts progressively to shorter wavelengths (from 730 to 722 nm) concomitant with the proteolytic degradation of the chromoprotein to the mixture of 118 and 114 kdalton species that comprise "120" kdalton phytochrome preparations. These two effects are inhibited in concert by the serine protease inhibitor, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and or maintenance of the phytochrome in the Pfr form. These results provide further evidence that 124 kdalton phytochrome is the native molecule in Avena and indicate that the peptide segments removed by proteolysis of the Pr form are important to the pigment's spectral integrity. The present data thus resolve the previously unsettled question of why the Pfr form of "120" kdalton phytochrome isolated by various procedures from Avena has been found to absorb at shorter wavelengths than that observed in vivo. Previous spectral studies with "120" kdalton phytochrome preparations are open to reexamination.

References

  1. Plant Physiol. 1981 Aug;68(2):443-6 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 - PubMed
  3. J Immunol. 1975 Dec;115(6):1617-24 - PubMed
  4. Plant Physiol. 1972 Apr;49(4):514-20 - PubMed
  5. Plant Physiol. 1979 Aug;64(2):332-6 - PubMed
  6. Photochem Photobiol. 1975 Feb;21(2):91-7 - PubMed
  7. Planta. 1982 Aug;155(3):212-7 - PubMed
  8. Plant Physiol. 1972 Apr;49(4):521-30 - PubMed
  9. Planta. 1974 Dec;118(4):345-55 - PubMed
  10. Plant Physiol. 1970 Jun;45(6):679-83 - PubMed
  11. Plant Physiol. 1973 May;51(5):927-38 - PubMed
  12. Planta. 1978 Jan;142(2):225-8 - PubMed
  13. Plant Physiol. 1973 May;51(5):917-26 - PubMed
  14. Planta. 1981 Jan;151(1):1-5 - PubMed
  15. Plant Physiol. 1971 Dec;48(6):686-93 - PubMed
  16. Biochemistry. 1966 Nov;5(11):3657-62 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(17):5272-6 - PubMed

Publication Types