Display options
Share it on

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013 Oct;3(5):262-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.10.05.

Prenatal ultrasound heating impacts on fluctuations in haematological analysis of Oryctolagus cuniculus.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery

Farah Wahida Ahmad Zaiki, Sulaiman Md Dom, Hairil Rashmizal Abdul Razak, Hamzah Fansuri Hassan

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

PMID: 24273744 PMCID: PMC3834203 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.10.05

Abstract

Prenatal Ultrasound (US) is commonly used as a routine procedure on pregnant women. It is generally perceived as a safe procedure due to the use of non-ionizing radiation. However, the neurotoxicity of diagnostic prenatal US was detected to have a correlation with high susceptibility to early developing fetus. This research involved in vivo experimental model by using 3(rd) trimester pregnant Oryctolagus cuniculus and exposing them to US exposures for 30, 60, and 90 minutes at their gestational day (GD) 28-29. The output power and intensities, spatial peak temporal average intensity (ISPTA) of US were varied from 0.4 to 0.7 W and 0.13 to 0.19 W/cm(2) respectively were tested initially in free-field, water. Haematological analysis was carried out to detect any changes in blood constituents. Statistically significant differences were detected in red blood cell (RBC) count (P<0.001), haemoglobin (Hb) concentration (P<0.001) and also platelet (PLT) count (P<0.001) in newborn of Oryctolagus cuniculus. These findings indicate the possibility of US heating in causing defects on studied animal.

Keywords: Defect; haematological analysis; newborn; prenatal; ultrasound heating

References

  1. Acta Haematol. 2000;103(4):226-8 - PubMed
  2. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Aug;36(8):1209-12 - PubMed
  3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;16(6):594-6 - PubMed
  4. Clin Chem. 2003 May;49(5):792-9 - PubMed
  5. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008 Apr;29(2):156-64 - PubMed
  6. Int J Hyperthermia. 2002 Sep-Oct;18(5):361-84 - PubMed
  7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):241-54 - PubMed
  8. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Feb;33(2):173-4 - PubMed
  9. Epidemiology. 2001 Nov;12(6):618-23 - PubMed
  10. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;21(1):100 - PubMed
  11. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Apr;27(4):597-605; quiz 606-9 - PubMed
  12. Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):295-324 - PubMed
  13. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007 Jan-Apr;93(1-3):331-53 - PubMed

Publication Types