Display options
Share it on

Springerplus. 2013 Dec 01;2:642. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-642. eCollection 2013.

Results of a clinical practice algorithm for the management of thoracostomy tubes placed for traumatic mechanism.

SpringerPlus

Mersadies Martin, Cory T Schall, Cheryl Anderson, Nicole Kopari, Alan T Davis, Penny Stevens, Pam Haan, John P Kepros, Benjamin D Mosher

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 1200 E Michigan Ave, Suite 655, Lansing, MI 48912 USA.

PMID: 24340246 PMCID: PMC3858589 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-642

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The management and removal of thoracostomy tubes for trauma-related hemothorax and pneumothorax is controversial. General recommendations exist; however, institutional data related to an algorithmic approach has not been well described. The difficulty in establishing an algorithm centers about individualized patients' needs for subsequent management after thoracostomy tube placement. In our institution, we use the same protocol for all trauma patients who receive a thoracostomy tube with minimal complications.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical outcomes of patients who required a tube thoracostomy for traumatic injury and were managed by an institutional protocol.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 313 trauma patients at a single level I trauma institution from January 2008 through June 2012 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patient age ≥ 18 years, involvement in a trauma, and requirement of a thoracostomy tube. The patients' charts were reviewed for demographic data, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), and chest-tube specific data. Thoracostomy tube complications were defined as persistent air leak, persistent pneumothorax, recurrent pneumothorax, and clotting of thoracostomy tube. The patients were managed per our institutional algorithm. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS: Most of the patients who required a thoracostomy tube had blunt-related traumas (271/313; 86.6%), while 42 patients (13.4%) sustained penetrating injuries. There were 215 (68.7%) male patients. The average age at time of injury was 45.7 ± 21.1 years and the mean ISS was 24.9 ± 15.9 (mean ± SD). Elevated alcohol levels were found in 65 of the 247 patients who were tested upon admission (26.3%). Overall, 15 patients (4.8%) developed a thoracostomy tube related complication: persistent air leak in six patients, persistent pneumothorax in six patients, recurrent pneumothorax in two patients, and clotted thoracostomy tube in one patient. The average LOS was 10.4 ± 8.4 days, and the mean length of thoracostomy tube placement was 5.9 ± 4.3 days.

CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithmic thoracostomy tube management protocol resulted in a complication rate of 4.8%. By managing thoracostomy tubes in a systematic manner, our patients have improved outcomes following placement and removal compared to other studies.

Keywords: Algorithm; Guideline; Hemothorax; Outcomes; Pneumothorax; Tube thoracostomy

References

  1. J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Nov;179(5):553-7 - PubMed
  2. J Trauma. 2001 Apr;50(4):674-7 - PubMed
  3. Arch Surg. 1995 May;130(5):521-5; discussion 525-6 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Aug;38(2):210-5 - PubMed
  5. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):111-4 - PubMed
  6. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):684-8 - PubMed
  7. J Inj Violence Res. 2009 Jul;1(1):33-6 - PubMed
  8. Injury. 2012 Jan;43(1):46-50 - PubMed
  9. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):422-7 - PubMed
  10. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):658-62 - PubMed
  11. Thorax. 2003 May;58 Suppl 2:ii53-9 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma. 1999 Mar;46(3):369-71; discussion 372-3 - PubMed
  13. Chest. 1997 Sep;112(3):709-13 - PubMed
  14. J Trauma. 2005 Jul;59(1):92-5 - PubMed
  15. Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Jul;15(4):368-70 - PubMed

Publication Types