Display options
Share it on

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2013 Dec 17;8(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-8-35.

Occupational accidents in professional dance with focus on gender differences.

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)

Eileen M Wanke, Michael Arendt, Helmgard Mill, David A Groneberg

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Occupational Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Thielallee 69, 14195 Berlin, Germany. [email protected].

PMID: 24341391 PMCID: PMC3878499 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6673-8-35

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classical dance comprises gender specific movement tasks. There is a lack of studies which investigate work related traumatic injuries in terms of gender specific differences in detail.

OBJECTIVE: To define gender related differences of occupational accidents.

METHODS: Basis for the evaluation were occupational injuries of professional dancers from three (n = 785; f: n = 358, m: n = 427) state theatres.

RESULTS: The incidence rate (0.36 per year) was higher in males (m: 0.45, f: 0.29). There were gender specific differences as to the localizations of injuries, particularly the spine region (m: 17.3%, f: 9.8%, p = 0.05) and ankle joint (m: 23.7%, f: 35.5%, p = 0.003). Compared to male dancers, females sustained more injuries resulting from extrinsic factors. Significant differences could specifically be observed with dance floors (m: 8.8%, f: 15.1%, p = 0.02). There were also significant gender differences observed with movement vocabulary.

CONCLUSION: The clearly defined gender specific movement activities in classical dance are reflected in occupational accidents sustained. Organisational structures as well as work environment represent a burden likewise to male and female dancers. The presented differences support the development of gender specific injury prevention measures.

References

  1. Int J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;32(7):485-9 - PubMed
  2. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 Jun;33(6):303-9 - PubMed
  3. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2187-93 - PubMed
  4. J Dance Med Sci. 2011 Sep;15(3):128-33 - PubMed
  5. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006 Nov;17(4):813-26, vii - PubMed
  6. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 May-Jun;141(3):349-56 - PubMed
  7. J Dance Med Sci. 2009;13(3):83-9 - PubMed
  8. J Dance Med Sci. 2013;17(1):24-33 - PubMed
  9. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006 Aug;17(3):697-723 - PubMed
  10. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2011 Sep;25(3):179-83 - PubMed
  11. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985 Jul;75(7):355-8 - PubMed
  12. Med Probl Perform Art. 2013 Sep;28(3):131-6 - PubMed
  13. Work. 2014;49(4):597-606 - PubMed
  14. BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):731-4 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):586-90 - PubMed
  16. Rehab Manag. 2010 Oct;23(9):10, 12-5 - PubMed
  17. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2732-40 - PubMed
  18. Clin Sports Med. 1983 Nov;2(3):557-61 - PubMed
  19. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):197-200 - PubMed
  20. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Dec;48(12):1613-4 - PubMed
  21. Med Probl Perform Art. 2012 Sep;27(3):137-42 - PubMed
  22. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):781-90 - PubMed
  23. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002 Dec;12(6):365-70 - PubMed
  24. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):97-106 - PubMed
  25. Med Probl Perform Art. 2011 Mar;26(1):35-8 - PubMed
  26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Jul;9(4):242-6 - PubMed
  27. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2011 Mar;25(1):56-61 - PubMed
  28. J Dance Med Sci. 2012 Dec;16(4):139-53 - PubMed

Publication Types