Display options
Cite
Boom CE, Herdono P, Koto CG, et al. Effect of hyperosmolar sodium lactate infusion on haemodynamic status and fluid balance compared with hydroxyethyl starch 6% during the cardiac surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57(6):576-82doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.123330.
Boom, C. E., Herdono, P., Koto, C. G., Hadi, S., & Permana, I. M. (2013). Effect of hyperosmolar sodium lactate infusion on haemodynamic status and fluid balance compared with hydroxyethyl starch 6% during the cardiac surgery. Indian journal of anaesthesia, 57(6), 576-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.123330
Boom, Cindy Elfir, et al. "Effect of hyperosmolar sodium lactate infusion on haemodynamic status and fluid balance compared with hydroxyethyl starch 6% during the cardiac surgery." Indian journal of anaesthesia vol. 57,6 (2013): 576-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.123330
Boom CE, Herdono P, Koto CG, Hadi S, Permana IM. Effect of hyperosmolar sodium lactate infusion on haemodynamic status and fluid balance compared with hydroxyethyl starch 6% during the cardiac surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;57(6):576-82. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.123330. PMID: 24403617; PMCID: PMC3883392.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;57(6):576-82. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.123330.

Effect of hyperosmolar sodium lactate infusion on haemodynamic status and fluid balance compared with hydroxyethyl starch 6% during the cardiac surgery.

Indian journal of anaesthesia

Cindy Elfir Boom, Poernomo Herdono, Chairil Gani Koto, Sjamsul Hadi, I Made Adi Permana

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

PMID: 24403617 PMCID: PMC3883392 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.123330

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: No solution has been determined ideal for fluid therapy during cardiac surgery. Previous studies have shown that hyperosmolar sodium lactate (HSL) infusion has improved cardiac performance with smaller volume infusion, which resulted in negative fluid balance. This study compared the effects between a patent-protected HSL infusion and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 6% on haemodynamic status of the patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS: In this open-label prospective controlled randomized study, patients were randomly assigned to receive loading dose of either HSL or HES 6%, at 3 mL/kgBW within 15 min, at the beginning of surgery. Haemodynamic parameters and fluid balance were evaluated, while biochemical parameters and any adverse effect were also recorded. Haemodynamic and laboratory parameters were analyzed through repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical assessment of fluid management was carried out through Student t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package for the social sciences(®) version 15, 2006 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS: Out of 100 enrolled patients in this study (50 patients in each arm), 98 patients were included in analysis (50 in HSL group; 48 in HES group). Cardiac index increased higher in HSL group (P = 0.01), whereas systemic vascular resistance index decreased more in HSL than HES group (P = 0.002). Other haemodynamic parameters were comparable between HSL and HES group. Fluid balance was negative in HSL group, but it was positive in HES group (-445.94 ± 815.30 mL vs. +108.479 ± 1219.91 mL, P < 0.009).

CONCLUSION: Administration of HSL solution during the cardiac surgery improved cardiac performance and haemodynamic status better than HES did.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery; fluid resuscitation; hydroxyethyl starch; hyperosmolar sodium lactate

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Oct;89(4):622-32 - PubMed
  2. Shock. 2000 Aug;14(2):208-14 - PubMed
  3. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):340-3 - PubMed
  4. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jan;76(1):13-9 - PubMed
  5. Ann Surg. 1961 Nov;154:803-10 - PubMed
  6. Chest. 1999 May;115(5):1224-6 - PubMed
  7. Arch Surg. 1995 Apr;130(4):423-9 - PubMed
  8. Surgery. 1988 Sep;104(3):553-60 - PubMed
  9. Anesthesiology. 2002 Oct;97(4):820-6 - PubMed
  10. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Mar;25(3):258-68 - PubMed
  11. Anaesthesist. 1990 Aug;39(8):412-9 - PubMed
  12. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001 Apr;15(2):210-5 - PubMed
  13. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Sep;20(3):439-55 - PubMed
  14. Shock. 2002 Oct;18(4):306-10 - PubMed
  15. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1572-1577 - PubMed
  16. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Nov;67(5):595-602 - PubMed
  17. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;90(4):440-5 - PubMed
  18. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1796-803 - PubMed
  19. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002 Feb;16(1):43-6 - PubMed
  20. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Aug;29(8):1279-85 - PubMed
  21. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005 Apr;60(2):159-72 - PubMed
  22. Chest. 1999 May;115(5 Suppl):106S-112S - PubMed
  23. Shock. 2000 Aug;14(2):215-21 - PubMed
  24. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Apr;51(4):610-5 - PubMed
  25. J Physiol. 2004 Jul 1;558(Pt 1):5-30 - PubMed
  26. Ann Card Anaesth. 2005 Jul;8(2):104-16 - PubMed
  27. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001 Feb;18(2):100-7 - PubMed
  28. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Mar;33(3):495-502 - PubMed

Publication Types