Display options
Cite
Saraiva LO, Aguiar TR, Costa L, et al. Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013;4(4):443-7doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123022.
Saraiva, L. O., Aguiar, T. R., Costa, L., Correr-Sobrinho, L., Muniz, L., & Mathias, P. (2013). Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 4(4), 443-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123022
Saraiva, Letícia Oliveria, et al. "Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis." Contemporary clinical dentistry vol. 4,4 (2013): 443-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.123022
Saraiva LO, Aguiar TR, Costa L, Correr-Sobrinho L, Muniz L, Mathias P. Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):443-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123022. PMID: 24403786; PMCID: PMC3883321.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):443-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123022.

Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis.

Contemporary clinical dentistry

Letícia Oliveria Saraiva, Thaiane Rodrigues Aguiar, Leonardo Costa, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Leonardo Muniz, Paula Mathias

Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. Department of Integrated Clinic, School of Dentistry, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  4. Department of Dental Materials and Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

PMID: 24403786 PMCID: PMC3883321 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.123022

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of phosphoric acid etching and the dentin pre-treatment with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the push-out bond strength between fiber post and root canal dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of 48 human incisors were selected, post spaces were prepared and assigned to four groups: G1-37% phosphoric acid (15 s); G2-5.25% NaOCl (2 min) +37% phosphoric acid (15 s); G3-37% phosphoric acid (60 s); and G4-5.25% NaOCl (2 min) +37% phosphoric acid (60 s). Fiber post cementation was performed with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system/dual-cured resin cement according to the manufacturer's recommendation. After 24 h, each root was sectioned transversally into three slices (cervical, middle and apical) and the bond strength of each section was determined using a push-out bond strength test. Morphology analysis of the bonded interface was evaluated using a scanning electron microscopy. Push-out strength data (MPa) were analyzed by Analysis of Variance and Tukey-Kramer (α = 0.05).

RESULTS: Considering the NaOCl pre-treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed among groups; however, when the phosphoric acid was applied during 60 s in the apical portion without NaOCl pre-treatment, the bond strength was statistically significant increased.

CONCLUSION: The NaOCl pre-treatment did not improve the bond strength of adhesive luting cement to root canal dentin. The findings suggest that the use of 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s may have a beneficial effect on bond strength in the apical root third.

Keywords: Dentin; fiber post; phosphoric acid; sodium hypochlorite

References

  1. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;3(2):90-5 - PubMed
  2. Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1484-92 - PubMed
  3. Quintessence Int. 2012 Jul-Aug;43(7):615-23 - PubMed
  4. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Mar;97(3):381-7 - PubMed
  5. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):153-8 - PubMed
  6. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Aug;112(4):353-61 - PubMed
  7. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Nov-Dec;14(6):543-9 - PubMed
  8. J Oral Sci. 2008 Jun;50(2):199-203 - PubMed
  9. Quintessence Int. 2007 May;38(5):387-94 - PubMed
  10. Dent Mater. 2012 Jul;28(7):722-8 - PubMed
  11. Int Endod J. 2008 Jun;41(6):476-84 - PubMed
  12. Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):543-51 - PubMed
  13. J Endod. 2006 May;32(5):389-98 - PubMed
  14. J Dent. 2009 Mar;37(3):219-27 - PubMed
  15. Braz Dent J. 1997;8(1):35-41 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Oct;117(5):597-603 - PubMed
  17. Gen Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;57(6):596-603; quiz 604-5, 595, 679 - PubMed
  18. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 Feb;100(2):577-83 - PubMed
  19. Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):840-7 - PubMed
  20. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):295-9 - PubMed
  21. Int Dent J. 2008 Dec;58(6):329-41 - PubMed
  22. Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1129-35 - PubMed
  23. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(2):130-3 - PubMed
  24. Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):533-9 - PubMed
  25. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Feb;10(2):135-44 - PubMed

Publication Types