Display options
Share it on

J Sci Teacher Educ. 2013;24(7):1133-1156. doi: 10.1007/s10972-013-9351-2.

Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Teaching and Knowledge Instrument for Science Teachers-Revised (SETAKIST-R): Lessons Learned.

Journal of science teacher education

Linda A Pruski, Sharon L Blanco, Rosemary A Riggs, Kandi K Grimes, Chase W Fordtran, Gina M Barbola, John E Cornell, Michael J Lichtenstein

Affiliations

  1. Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Teacher Enrichment Initiatives, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7780, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 USA ; Barshop Institute for Aging and Longevity Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lamda Drive, MSC 7755, San Antonio, TX 78245 USA.
  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7933, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 USA.
  3. Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Teacher Enrichment Initiatives, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7780, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 USA ; Barshop Institute for Aging and Longevity Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lamda Drive, MSC 7755, San Antonio, TX 78245 USA ; Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7759, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900 USA.

PMID: 24347999 PMCID: PMC3860844 DOI: 10.1007/s10972-013-9351-2

Abstract

Described herein is the academic lineage and independent validation of the Self-Efficacy Teaching and Knowledge Instrument for Science Teachers-Revised (SETAKIST-R). Data from 334 K-12 science teachers were analyzed using Partial Credit Rasch models. Principal components analysis on the person-item residuals suggest two latent dimensions: Knowledge and Teaching Self-Efficacies. Item-fit statistics were used to select items for each subscale. Person and item separation (reliability) indices were quite low, and we noted disordered response patterns on the person-item maps that revealed problems with item content and/or scaling for both subscales. These issues include the presence of: verbal negatives, ambiguous modifiers, counter-intuitive scaling, and an "undecided/uncertain" option. The SETAKIST-R, in its current form, cannot be recommended as a measure of science teacher self-efficacy.

Keywords: Rasch analysis; SETAKIST-R; Self-efficacy teaching and knowledge instrument for science teachers-revised; Teacher efficacy; Teacher professional development; Teacher self-efficacy beliefs

References

  1. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1-28 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support