Front Neurosci. 2013 Nov 29;7:227. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00227. eCollection 2013.

The relationship between the age of onset of musical training and rhythm synchronization performance: validation of sensitive period effects.

Frontiers in neuroscience

Jennifer A Bailey, Virginia B Penhune

PMID: 24348323 PMCID: PMC3843222 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00227

Abstract

A sensitive period associated with musical training has been proposed, suggesting the influence of musical training on the brain and behavior is strongest during the early years of childhood. Experiments from our laboratory have directly tested the sensitive period hypothesis for musical training by comparing musicians who began their training prior to age seven with those who began their training after age seven, while matching the two groups in terms of musical experience (Watanabe et al., 2007; Bailey and Penhune, 2010, 2012). Using this matching paradigm, the early-trained groups have demonstrated enhanced sensorimotor synchronization skills and associated differences in brain structure (Bailey et al., 2013; Steele et al., 2013). The current study takes a different approach to investigating the sensitive period hypothesis for musical training by examining a single large group of unmatched musicians (N = 77) and exploring the relationship between age of onset of musical training as a continuous variable and performance on the Rhythm Synchronization Task (RST), a previously used auditory-motor RST. Interestingly, age of onset was correlated with task performance for those who began training earlier, however, no such relationship was observed among those who began training in their later childhood years. In addition, years of formal training showed a similar pattern. However, individual working memory scores were predictive of task performance, regardless of age of onset of musical training. Overall, these results support the sensitive period hypothesis for musical training and suggest a non-linear relationship between age of onset of musical training and auditory-motor rhythm synchronization abilities, such that a relationship exists early in childhood but then plateaus later on in development, similar to maturational growth trajectories of brain regions implicated in playing music.

Keywords: brain development; early training; musical training; sensitive period; working memory

References

1. Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):989-94 - PubMed
2. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Nov;6(11):877-88 - PubMed
3. Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):312-26 - PubMed
4. Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1;46(3):600-7 - PubMed
5. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33 - PubMed
6. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):521-38 - PubMed
7. Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1012-7 - PubMed
8. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Aug;33(8):1047-55 - PubMed
9. Cogn Psychol. 1989 Jan;21(1):60-99 - PubMed
10. Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 15;40(3):1044-55 - PubMed
11. Neuroscientist. 2010 Oct;16(5):566-77 - PubMed
12. Prog Brain Res. 2011;191:119-31 - PubMed
13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):8174-9 - PubMed
14. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jul;204(1):91-101 - PubMed
15. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1412-25 - PubMed
16. J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 16;33(3):1282-90 - PubMed
17. Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61 - PubMed
18. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Apr;1252:163-70 - PubMed
19. Psychol Bull. 1993 Mar;113(2):345-61 - PubMed
20. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Oct;30(10):3172-87 - PubMed
21. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5(3):206-15 - PubMed
22. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):332-40 - PubMed
23. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):226-39 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article