Display options
Share it on

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Sep;10(5):643-6.

Microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following fissurotomy bur or pumice prophylaxis use before etching.

Dental research journal

Ali Bagherian, Majid Akbari, Mohsen Rezaeian, Ghassem Ansari

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
  2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  3. Department of Social Medicine, Medical School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
  4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Evin, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 24348623 PMCID: PMC3858740

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prolonged life of fissure sealant has always been the target for preventing caries in vulnerable newly erupted teeth. The use of preparatory techniques including bur introduction to the fissures is considered among such improving steps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety freshly extracted healthy maxillary premolar teeth were randomly selected for this investigation. Teeth were then divided into three fissure sealant preparatory groups of A: Fissurotomy bur + acid etch; B: Pumice prophylaxis + acid etch and C: Acid etch alone. Sealant was applied to the occlusal fissures of all specimens using a plastic instrument. This was to avoid any air trap under the sealant. Sample teeth were first thermocycled (1000 cycles, 20 s dwell time) and then coated with two layers of nail varnish leaving 2 mm around the sealant. This was then followed by immersion in basic fuchsin 3%. Processed teeth were sectioned longitudinally and examined under a stereomicroscope for microleakage assessment using a score of 0-3. Collected data was then subjected to Kruskall-Wallis Analysis of Variance and Mann-Whitney U-test. P > 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS: Teeth in fissurotomy bur and pumice prophylaxis groups had significantly reduced level of microleakage than those in acid etch alone (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Use of fissurotomy bur and pumice prophylaxis accompanied with acid etching appears to have a more successful reduction of microleakage than acid etch alone.

Keywords: Fissure sealant; fissurotomy; microleakage; permanent teeth; preparation; prevention

References

  1. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 May;26(5):436-41 - PubMed
  2. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):321-30 - PubMed
  3. Gen Dent. 1998 May-Jun;46(3):278-80 - PubMed
  4. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984 Nov-Dec;51(6):425-7 - PubMed
  5. J Am Dent Assoc. 1967 Jul;75(1):121-8 - PubMed
  6. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978 Sep;97(3):455-62 - PubMed
  7. Pediatr Dent. 1986 Sep;8(3):204-5 - PubMed
  8. Am J Dent. 1998 Jun;11(3):109-13 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Sep;8(3):119-23 - PubMed
  10. ASDC J Dent Child. 1996 May-Jun;63(3):175-80 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 Jul;32(1):62-5 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994 Fall;19(1):13-8 - PubMed
  13. Oper Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;24(6):331-6 - PubMed
  14. Pediatr Dent. 2007 Jul-Aug;29(4):308-14 - PubMed
  15. Pediatr Dent. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):199-203 - PubMed
  16. Pediatr Dent. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):173-6 - PubMed
  17. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Jun;26(2):64-6 - PubMed
  18. J Dent. 1976 Sep;4(5):199-206 - PubMed
  19. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Winter;5(4):313-21 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996 Summer;20(4):299-304 - PubMed
  21. Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):383-7 - PubMed
  22. Oper Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;31(5):543-50 - PubMed
  23. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Jul;14(4):272-8 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998 Spring;22(3):231-5 - PubMed
  25. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):393-414 - PubMed
  26. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001 Nov;11(6):409-16 - PubMed
  27. Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Feb;98(1):66-9 - PubMed
  28. Quintessence Int. 1990 Mar;21(3):201-6 - PubMed
  29. Caries Res. 1993;27 Suppl 1:77-82 - PubMed

Publication Types