West J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;14(6):609-16. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.5.16112.

National Study of Non-urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization.

The western journal of emergency medicine

Leah S Honigman, Jennifer L Wiler, Sean Rooks, Adit A Ginde

PMID: 24381681 PMCID: PMC3876304 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2013.5.16112

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.

RESULTS: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95% CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95% CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95% CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95% CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95% CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95% CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95% CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95% CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95% CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95% CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.

CONCLUSIONS: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as "unnecessary," particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury.

References

1. Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Winter;13(5):162-71 - PubMed
2. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994 Jul;(34):1-78 - PubMed
3. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):423-426.e8 - PubMed
4. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):822-9 - PubMed
5. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):59-65 - PubMed
6. Health Care Anal. 2009 Mar;17(1):1-19 - PubMed
7. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):333-45 - PubMed
8. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;8(11):1030-6 - PubMed
9. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Sep;30(3):286-91 - PubMed
10. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 May;45(5):483-90 - PubMed
11. Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;17(4):208-13 - PubMed
12. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;25(3):311-6 - PubMed
13. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1302-10 - PubMed
14. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):716-721.e1 - PubMed
15. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):4-10.e2 - PubMed
16. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):722-5 - PubMed
17. Med Care Res Rev. 1995 Nov;52(4):453-74 - PubMed
18. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1397-9 - PubMed
19. N Engl J Med. 1996 Mar 7;334(10):642-6 - PubMed
20. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2000 Nov;(433):1-5 - PubMed
21. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;7(3):236-42 - PubMed
22. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;23(2):131-7 - PubMed
23. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):870-4 - PubMed
24. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):32-40 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article