Display options
Share it on

Cell J. 2014;15(4):282-93. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Hydrostatic pressure affects in vitro maturation of oocytes and follicles and increases granulosa cell death.

Cell journal

Zahra Rashidi, Mehri Azadbakht, Ali Amini, Isac Karimi

Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
  2. 2.Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

PMID: 24381852 PMCID: PMC3866531

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effects of hydrostatic pressure on in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes derived from in vitro grown follicles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, preantral follicles were isolated from 12-day-old female NMRI mice. Each follicle was cultured individually in Alpha Minimal Essential Medium (α-MEM) under mineral oil for 12 days. Then, follicles were induced for IVM and divided into two groups, control and experiment. In the experiment group follicles were subjected to 20 mmHg pressure for 30 minutes and cultured for 24-48 hours. We assessed for viability and IVM of the oocytes. The percentage of apoptosis in cumulus cells was determined by the TUNEL assay. A comparison between groups was made using the student's t test.

RESULTS: The percentage of metaphase II oocytes (MII) increased in hydrostatic pressuretreated follicles compared to controls (p<0.05). Cumulus cell viability reduced in hydrostatic pressure-treated follicles compared to controls (p<0.05). Exposure of follicles to pressure increased apoptosis in cumulus cells compared to controls (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION: Hydrostatic pressure, by inducing apoptosis in cumulus cells, participates in the cumulus oocyte coupled relationship with oocyte maturation.

Keywords: Apoptosis; Hydrostatic Pressure; In vitro Maturation; Mouse; Oocyte

References

  1. Am J Physiol. 1963 Dec;205:1067-72 - PubMed
  2. Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Mar;12(3):90-7 - PubMed
  3. Reproduction. 2003 Mar;125(3):369-76 - PubMed
  4. Rev Reprod. 1996 Sep;1(3):162-72 - PubMed
  5. Dev Biol. 2008 Apr 1;316(1):100-9 - PubMed
  6. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;13(1):3-9 - PubMed
  7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Feb;28(2):107-10 - PubMed
  8. Hum Reprod. 1996 Dec;11(12):2656-66 - PubMed
  9. Theriogenology. 2000 Jan 1;53(1):11-20 - PubMed
  10. J Anim Sci. 2004 Jul;82(7):1967-75 - PubMed
  11. Cell J. 2012 Winter;13(4):259-64 - PubMed
  12. Zygote. 2002 Feb;10(1):59-64 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 11;101(19):7323-8 - PubMed
  14. Theriogenology. 2005 May;63(8):2147-63 - PubMed
  15. Connect Tissue Res. 2003;44(1):50-7 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Biol. 2010 Jun 15;213(Pt 12):2125-30 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 2005 May 19;435(7040):365-9 - PubMed
  18. Reproduction. 2001 Feb;121(2):307-14 - PubMed
  19. Hum Reprod. 2008 May;23(5):1151-8 - PubMed
  20. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jul;22(7):1959-72 - PubMed
  21. Fertil Steril. 1979 Feb;31(2):205-13 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosci Res. 2000 May 15;60(4):495-503 - PubMed
  23. Reproduction. 2005 Dec;130(6):857-68 - PubMed
  24. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(3):588-602 - PubMed
  25. Biol Reprod. 1995 Jul;53(1):8-12 - PubMed
  26. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007 Jun;42(3):271-4 - PubMed
  27. Iran J Reprod Med. 2012 May;10(3):257-64 - PubMed
  28. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jun;106(1-2):200-7 - PubMed
  29. Reproduction. 2008 Jan;135(1):13-7 - PubMed
  30. Fertil Steril. 1990 Dec;54(6):1045-51 - PubMed
  31. Brain Res. 2006 May 1;1086(1):191-200 - PubMed
  32. Blood. 2000 Jul 1;96(1):307-13 - PubMed
  33. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2000 Apr;36(4):235-40 - PubMed
  34. Hum Reprod. 1997 Apr;12(4):759-68 - PubMed
  35. Fertil Steril. 2001 Nov;76(5):936-42 - PubMed
  36. J Exp Zool. 1983 Apr;226(1):129-35 - PubMed
  37. Reproduction. 2002 Feb;123(2):185-202 - PubMed
  38. Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2152-9 - PubMed
  39. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 28;102(26):9206-11 - PubMed

Publication Types