Biol Sex Differ. 2014 Jan 03;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-5-1.

Coronary vessels and cardiac myocytes of middle-aged rats demonstrate regional sex-specific adaptation in response to postmyocardial infarction remodeling.

Biology of sex differences

Eduard I Dedkov, Kunal Oak, Lance P Christensen, Robert J Tomanek

PMID: 24383822 PMCID: PMC3892039 DOI: 10.1186/2042-6410-5-1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing body of evidence indicates that left ventricular (LV) remodeling, especially the degree of reactive myocardial hypertrophy after myocardial infarction (MI), differs in males and females. Surprisingly, to date, the sex-specific post-MI alterations of the coronary vasculature remain undetermined. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that adaptive coronary arteriolar and capillary modifications occurring in response to reactive myocyte hypertrophy differ between middle-aged male and female post-MI rats.

METHODS: A large MI was induced in 12-month-old male (M-MI) and female (F-MI) Sprague-Dawley rats by ligation of the left coronary artery. Four weeks after surgery, rats with transmural infarctions, greater than 50% of the LV free wall (FW), were evaluated. Sham-operated male (M-Sham) and female (F-Sham) rats served as an age-matched controls.

RESULTS: F-MI and M-MI rats had similar sized infarcts (61.3% ± 3.9% vs. 61.5% ± 1.2%) and scale of LV remodeling, as indicated analogous remodeling indices (1.41 ± 0.11 vs. 1.39 ± 0.09). The degree of reactive post-MI myocardial hypertrophy was adequate to normalize LV weight-to-body weight ratio in both sexes; however, the F-MI rats, in contrast to males, showed no myocyte enlargement in the LVFW epimyocardium. At the same time, a greater than 50% expansion of myocyte area in the male epimyocardium and in the female endomyocardium was accompanied by a 23% (P < 0.05) increase in capillary-to-myocyte ratio, indicative of adaptive angiogenesis. Based on arteriolar length density in post-MI hearts, the resistance vessels grew in the male LVFW as well as the septum by 24% and 29%, respectively. In contrast, in females, a significant (30%) expansion of arteriolar bed was limited only to the LVFW. Moreover, in F-MI rats, the enlargement of the arteriolar bed occurred predominantly in the vessels with diameters <30 μm, whereas in M-MI rats, a substantial (two- to threefold) increase in the density of larger arterioles (30 to 50 μm in diameter) was also documented.

CONCLUSION: Our data reveal that while both sexes have a relatively similar pattern of global LV remodeling and adaptive angiogenesis in response to a large MI, male and female middle-aged rats differ markedly in the regional scale of reactive cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and adaptive arteriogenesis.

References

1. J Endocrinol. 1984 Jan;100(1):43-50 - PubMed
2. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1980 Apr;104(4):179-83 - PubMed
3. Cardiovasc Res. 2004 Feb 15;61(3):620-9 - PubMed
4. Am J Physiol. 1994 Apr;266(4 Pt 2):H1434-8 - PubMed
5. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):H2684-93 - PubMed
6. Dev Dyn. 2007 Jul;236(7):2004-10 - PubMed
7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3 Suppl):S21-9 - PubMed
8. Circ Res. 1991 Mar;68(3):856-69 - PubMed
9. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Oct;291(4):H1686-93 - PubMed
10. Anat Rec. 1970 May;167(1):55-62 - PubMed
11. J Histochem Cytochem. 2013 Nov;61(11):833-48 - PubMed
12. Cardiology. 1999;91(3):173-83 - PubMed
13. Cardiovasc Res. 1997 Mar;33(3):671-6 - PubMed
14. Circulation. 2000 Jun 27;101(25):2981-8 - PubMed
15. Circ Res. 1986 Jan;58(1):26-37 - PubMed
16. J Transl Med. 2013 Feb 14;11:40 - PubMed
17. J Interv Cardiol. 2006 Aug;19(4):340-4 - PubMed
18. J Card Fail. 2002 Dec;8(6 Suppl):S476-85 - PubMed
19. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Aug 1;54(3):407-10 - PubMed
20. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2349-55 - PubMed
21. Am J Physiol. 1997 Dec;273(6):H2652-8 - PubMed
22. Cardioscience. 1995 Jun;6(2):101-6 - PubMed
23. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001 Oct 20;131(41-42):610-5 - PubMed
24. Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Feb 15;53(3):720-7 - PubMed
25. Cardiovasc Res. 1996 Dec;32(6):1088-95 - PubMed
26. Cardiovasc Res. 1998 Oct;40(1):156-64 - PubMed
27. Circulation. 1990 Jan;81(1):238-46 - PubMed
28. Eur Heart J. 1990 Apr;11 Suppl B:123-32 - PubMed
29. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Mar 1;51(5):872-6 - PubMed
30. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Mar;33(3):835-42 - PubMed
31. Circulation. 1988 Jul;78(1):186-201 - PubMed
32. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 8;51(14):1384-92 - PubMed
33. Exp Cell Res. 1996 Aug 1;226(2):316-27 - PubMed
34. Cardiovasc Res. 1994 Jul;28(7):969-72 - PubMed
35. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Dec;283(6):H2544-50 - PubMed
36. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 May;296(5):H1551-7 - PubMed
37. Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Feb;57(2):388-94 - PubMed
38. Biol Reprod. 1994 Dec;51(6):1264-72 - PubMed
39. Circulation. 1990 Apr;81(4):1161-72 - PubMed
40. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983 Dec;61(12):1516-22 - PubMed
41. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):H590-8 - PubMed
42. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;41(2):300-6 - PubMed
43. Heart Vessels. 2007 Jan;22(1):9-15 - PubMed
44. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2009 Sep;234(9):1011-9 - PubMed
45. Cardiovasc Res. 1990 Apr;24(4):278-84 - PubMed
46. Heart Vessels. 2013 Sep;28(5):551-8 - PubMed
47. Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):356-67 - PubMed
48. Am J Physiol. 1994 Sep;267(3 Pt 2):H1062-73 - PubMed
49. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Nov 18;68(14):7D-16D - PubMed
50. Circulation. 1996 Jan 15;93(2):349-55 - PubMed
51. Life Sci. 2004 Sep 17;75(18):2181-92 - PubMed
52. Cardiovasc Res. 2011 Apr 1;90(1):9-17 - PubMed
53. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Jul;297(1):H322-30 - PubMed
54. J Lab Clin Med. 2000 Apr;135(4):316-23 - PubMed
55. Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2872-83 - PubMed
56. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011 Sep-Oct;20(5):e189-95 - PubMed
57. Clin Cardiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):E44-9 - PubMed
58. Circ Res. 1990 Jul;67(1):23-34 - PubMed
59. Hypertension. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 2):795-801 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article