Display options
Share it on

Springerplus. 2013 Dec 19;2:683. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-683. eCollection 2013.

Investigation of the effectiveness of the "Girls on the Go!" program for building self-esteem in young women: trial protocol.

SpringerPlus

Loredana Tirlea, Helen Truby, Terry P Haines

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Southern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, 3168 Victoria Melbourne Australia ; Monash Health, (formerly Southern Health) Greater Dandenong Community Health Services, Springvale, Melbourne Australia.
  2. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Southern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, 3168 Victoria Melbourne Australia.
  3. Department of Physiotherapy, Southern Physiotherapy Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, Melbourne Australia ; Monash Health, (formerly Southern Health) Allied Health Research Unit, Kingston, Melbourne Australia.

PMID: 24386627 PMCID: PMC3877412 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-683

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body Image is a major factor affecting health in a range of age groups, but has particular significance for adolescents. The aim of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of the "Girls on the Go!" program delivered outside of the school environment by health professionals to girls at risk of developing poor self-esteem on the outcomes of self-esteem, impairment induced by eating disorders, body satisfaction, self-efficacy, and dieting behaviour.

METHOD: A stepped wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial that was conducted in two phases on the basis of student population (Study 1 = secondary school age participants; Study 2 = primary school age participants). The waiting list for the "Girls on the Go!" program was used to generate the control periods. A total of 12 schools that requested the program were separated into study 1 or 2 on the basis of student population (Study 1 = secondary, Study 2 = primary). Schools were matched on the basis of number of students and were allocated to receiving the intervention immediately or having a waiting list period. Study 1 had one waiting list period of one school term, creating two steps in the stepped-wedge design (i.e. 3 schools were provided with "Girls on the Go!" each term over 2 terms). Study 2 had two waiting list periods of one and two school terms, creating three steps in the stepped-wedge design (i.e. 2 schools were provided with "Girls on the Go!" each term over 3 terms). Primary outcome measures were self-esteem and impairment inducted by eating disorders.

DISCUSSION: There is a lack of preventative interventions currently available that address low self-esteem, low self-efficacy and body dissatisfaction in young women. This project will be the first group-based, professional-led, targeted program conducted outside the school environment amongst school age young women to be evaluated via a randomised control trial. These findings will indicate if the "Girls on the Go!" program may be successfully used and applied in a culturally diverse environment and with young women of all shapes and sizes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ACTRN12610000513011).

Keywords: Adolescents; Body image; Community health intervention; Disordered eating; Eating disorders; Girls; Group therapy; Health promotion; Self-esteem; Young women

References

  1. Am Psychol. 1996 Nov;51(11):1130-3 - PubMed
  2. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2007 Jun;35(3):379-91 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Bull. 2002 Sep;128(5):825-48 - PubMed
  4. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Dec;100(12):1466-73 - PubMed
  5. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 May;34(5):583-98 - PubMed
  6. J Sch Health. 2000 Jan;70(1):18-21 - PubMed
  7. Appetite. 2010 Feb;54(1):5-15 - PubMed
  8. Int J Eat Disord. 1997 Sep;22(2):167-72 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Dec;35(4):539-49 - PubMed
  10. Eat Behav. 2003 Jan;3(4):387-96 - PubMed
  11. Body Image. 2009 Mar;6(2):75-82 - PubMed
  12. Int J Eat Disord. 2004 Jul;36(1):1-11 - PubMed
  13. Adolescence. 2006 Spring;41(161):55-74 - PubMed
  14. Int J Eat Disord. 2003 May;33(4):371-83; discussion 384-7 - PubMed
  15. Nutr J. 2011 Jan 24;10:9 - PubMed
  16. Am Sociol Rev. 1973 Oct;38(5):553-68 - PubMed
  17. Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Jul;28(1):43-57 - PubMed
  18. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Oct;46(10):1105-10 - PubMed
  19. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 May;35(2):193-203 - PubMed
  20. J Sch Health. 2002 May;72(5):199-204 - PubMed
  21. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):19-22 - PubMed
  22. Eat Disord. 2003 Fall;11(3):169-85 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:207-31 - PubMed
  24. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Dec;67(6):967-74 - PubMed
  25. Eat Disord. 2006 May-Jun;14(3):191-213 - PubMed
  26. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Jun;105(6):929-36 - PubMed
  27. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Mar;29(2):107-18 - PubMed
  28. Eat Disord. 2004 Summer;12(3):225-39 - PubMed
  29. Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Jun;54(3):899-905 - PubMed
  30. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jan;49(1):32-41 - PubMed
  31. Health Educ Res. 2004 Aug;19(4):357-72 - PubMed
  32. Eat Disord. 2002 Spring;10(1):1-13 - PubMed
  33. Eat Disord. 2001 Winter;9(4):313-25 - PubMed
  34. Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Dec;32(4):401-11 - PubMed
  35. Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):129-36 - PubMed
  36. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):825-34 - PubMed
  37. Health Educ Res. 2005 Apr;20(2):259-65 - PubMed
  38. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Mar;40(3):245-51 - PubMed
  39. Health Educ Res. 1993 Mar;8(1):43-51 - PubMed
  40. Int J Eat Disord. 2008 Jan;41(1):72-81 - PubMed
  41. Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):206-27 - PubMed
  42. Child Today. 1984 Nov-Dec;13(6):7-11 - PubMed

Publication Types