J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010 Oct 01;1(3):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2010.1303. eCollection 2010.
Protein adsorption to surface chemistry and crystal structure modification of titanium surfaces.
Journal of oral & maxillofacial research
Ryo Jimbo, Mikael Ivarsson, Anita Koskela, Young-Taeg Sul, Carina B Johansson
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University Malmö Sweden. ; Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University Göteborg Sweden.
- Clinical Research Center, Örebro University Hosptial Örebro Sweden.
- Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University Göteborg Sweden. ; Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Seoul South Korea.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University Örebro Sweden.
PMID: 24421973
PMCID: PMC3886052 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2010.1303
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To observe the early adsorption of extracellular matrix and blood plasma proteins to magnesium-incorporated titanium oxide surfaces, which has shown superior bone response in animal models.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Commercially pure titanium discs were blasted with titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles (control), and for the test group, TiO2 blasted discs were further processed with a micro-arc oxidation method (test). Surface morphology was investigated by scanning electron microscopy, surface topography by optic interferometry, characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The adsorption of 3 different proteins (fibronectin, albumin, and collagen type I) was investigated by an immunoblotting technique.
RESULTS: The test surface showed a porous structure, whereas the control surface showed a typical TiO2 blasted structure. XPS data revealed magnesium-incorporation to the anodic oxide film of the surface. There was no difference in surface roughness between the control and test surfaces. For the protein adsorption test, the amount of albumin was significantly higher on the control surface whereas the amount of fibronectin was significantly higher on the test surface. Although there was no significant difference, the test surface had a tendency to adsorb more collagen type I.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnesium-incorporated anodized surface showed significantly higher fibronectin adsorption and lower albumin adsorption than the blasted surface. These results may be one of the reasons for the excellent bone response previously observed in animal studies.
Keywords: albumins; collagen type I.; fibronectins; immunoblotting; magnesium; titanium dioxide
References
- J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Apr;25(4):706-15 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 2002 Oct 15;115(Pt 20):3861-3 - PubMed
- J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010 Apr 01;1(1):e4 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Nov;57(2):258-67 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 1996 Jul;17(13):1279-87 - PubMed
- Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):2222-9 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):38-46 - PubMed
- Histol Histopathol. 2001 Apr;16(2):603-11 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2005 May;84(5):407-13 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):680-5 - PubMed
- Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):79-85 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Nov;62(2):175-84 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Aug;90(2):608-13 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2001 Jun;22(11):1241-51 - PubMed
- Calcif Tissue Int. 1983 Sep;35(6):755-61 - PubMed
- Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(2):78-87 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Apr;28(2):131-41 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Dec;11(6):530-9 - PubMed
- J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Feb;18(2):245-53 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2006 May;27(13):2682-91 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1146-55 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2005 Nov;26(33):6720-30 - PubMed
- Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(2):101-10 - PubMed
- J R Soc Interface. 2010 Jan 6;7(42):81-90 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Jun 15;89(4):942-50 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):659-66 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2002 Feb;23(4):1269-79 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):631-40 - PubMed
- Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):55-61 - PubMed
- Calcif Tissue Res. 1969;3(4):318-26 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2004 Jul;83(7):529-33 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 1969 Mar;3(1):43-67 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(5):522-30 - PubMed
- Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jul-Aug;19(4):319-28 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 1998 May;111 ( Pt 10):1385-93 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Mar;6(1):24-30 - PubMed
- BMC Struct Biol. 2003 Jul 7;3:6 - PubMed
- Langmuir. 2008 Aug 19;24(16):8402-4 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Dec;8 Suppl 2:S483-7 - PubMed
- J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2003;14(9):973-88 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2007 Aug;28(24):3469-77 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 2009 Sep 18;284(38):25879-88 - PubMed
Publication Types