Display options
Share it on

Hand (N Y). 2013 Dec;8(4):382-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9536-3.

Determinants of distal radius fracture management in polytrauma patients.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)

Joshua M Adkinson, Anna M Soltys, Nathan F Miller, Sherrine M Eid, Robert X Murphy

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest & I-78, P.O. Box 689, Allentown, PA 18105-1556 USA.
  2. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA.
  3. Department of Community Health and Health Studies, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA USA.

PMID: 24426953 PMCID: PMC3840753 DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9536-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 640,000 distal radius fractures occur annually in the United States. No studies have been performed looking specifically at polytrauma patients who sustain distal radius fractures. We sought to determine variables affecting management of distal radius fractures in polytrauma patients.

METHODS: An IRB-approved review of trauma patients from 2008-2011 was performed. Records for patients with distal radius fractures were examined, assessing age, gender, Glascow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, mechanism, type, and characteristics of injury, as well as operative repair. A logistic regression was performed using SPSS 15.0.

RESULTS: The database identified 12,054 patients, 434 sustaining a distal radius fracture. No statistically significant difference in operative repair based on mechanism of injury (p = 0.465) was identified. A total of 285 patients (65.7 %) underwent surgery for distal radius fractures. In univariate analysis, younger age was the only statistically significant demographic predictor of surgical intervention (p = 0.003). In both univariate analysis and logistic regression, open, intra-articular, displaced, and comminuted fractures, as well as those with concomitant ulna fractures were statistically significantly associated with operative repair. Fracture displacement was the most likely variable to be associated with surgical intervention (OR = 12.761, 95 % CI[7.219, 22.556]) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In polytrauma patients, surgery for distal radius fractures is associated with younger age, open, intra-articular, displaced, and comminuted fractures, as well as concomitant ulna fractures. Displaced fractures were almost 13 times more likely to undergo surgical intervention than non-displaced fractures. Gender and mechanism of injury are not predictive of surgical intervention.

Keywords: Distal radius fractures; Polytrauma; Surgery

References

  1. J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jan;29(1):96-102 - PubMed
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1851-7 - PubMed
  3. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar;18(3):180-9 - PubMed
  4. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(4-5):188-92 - PubMed
  5. J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(10):739-48 - PubMed
  6. J Hand Surg Am. 2001 Sep;26(5):908-15 - PubMed
  7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 May 31;8:48 - PubMed
  8. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):97-103 - PubMed
  9. Injury. 2000 Mar;31(2):75-9 - PubMed
  10. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):764-72 - PubMed
  11. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;10(5):463-77 - PubMed
  12. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(4):341-8 - PubMed
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):647-59 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2154-62 - PubMed
  15. Hand Clin. 2012 May;28(2):113-25 - PubMed
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):1944-51 - PubMed
  17. J Trauma. 1990 Nov;30(11):1356-65 - PubMed
  18. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985 Oct;56(5):391-3 - PubMed
  19. Bone. 1995 Nov;17(5 Suppl):505S-511S - PubMed
  20. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jul;21(7):1247-55 - PubMed
  21. Hand Clin. 2012 May;28(2):185-98 - PubMed
  22. J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Jan;25(1):19-28 - PubMed
  23. Hand Clin. 2005 Aug;21(3):295-305 - PubMed
  24. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Jan;32(1):76-83 - PubMed
  25. Hand Clin. 2012 May;28(2):135-44 - PubMed
  26. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Nov;27(6):965-71 - PubMed
  27. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 May;(206):202-10 - PubMed
  28. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109(1):34-8 - PubMed
  29. J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Mar;19(2):325-40 - PubMed
  30. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Jul;57(7):777-82; discussion 782-3 - PubMed

Publication Types