Display options
Share it on

Sensors (Basel). 2014 Jan 24;14(2):2012-27. doi: 10.3390/s140202012.

Wearable monitoring devices for assistive technology: case studies in post-polio syndrome.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)

Giuseppe Andreoni, Marco Mazzola, Paolo Perego, Carlo Emilio Standoli, Simone Manzoni, Luca Piccini, Franco Molteni

Affiliations

  1. Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, via G. Durando 38/A, Milan 20158, Italy. [email protected].
  2. Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, via G. Durando 38/A, Milan 20158, Italy. [email protected].
  3. Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, via G. Durando 38/A, Milan 20158, Italy. [email protected].
  4. Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, via G. Durando 38/A, Milan 20158, Italy. [email protected].
  5. Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, via G. Durando 38/A, Milan 20158, Italy. [email protected].
  6. SXT-Sistemi per Telemedicina s.r.l., via M. D'Oggiono 18/A, Lecco 23900, Italy. [email protected].
  7. Villa Beretta" Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Via N.Sauro, 17 - 23845 Costa Masnaga (LC), Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 24469354 PMCID: PMC3958267 DOI: 10.3390/s140202012

Abstract

The correct choice and customization of an orthosis are crucial to obtain the best comfort and efficiency. This study explored the feasibility of a multivariate quantitative assessment of the functional efficiency of lower limb orthosis through a novel wearable system. Gait basographic parameters and energetic indexes were analysed during a Six-Minute Walking Test (6-MWT) through a cost-effective, non-invasive polygraph device, with a multichannel wireless transmission, that carried out electro-cardiograph (ECG); impedance-cardiograph (ICG); and lower-limb accelerations detection. Four subjects affected by Post-Polio Syndrome (PPS) were recruited. The wearable device and the semi-automatic post-processing software provided a novel set of objective data to assess the overall efficiency of the patient-orthosis system. Despite the small number of examined subjects, the results obtained with this new approach encourage the application of the method thus enlarging the dataset to validate this promising protocol and measuring system in supporting clinical decisions and out of a laboratory environment.

References

  1. Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):60-8 - PubMed
  2. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:5924-7 - PubMed
  3. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):2041-6 - PubMed
  4. Orthopedics. 1985 Jul;8(7):877-81 - PubMed
  5. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(2):215-22 - PubMed
  6. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999 May;37(3):304-8 - PubMed
  7. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998 Jun;13(4-5):328-335 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2005 Jun 4;330(7503):1314-8 - PubMed
  9. Gait Posture. 1999 Jul;9(3):207-31 - PubMed
  10. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999 Jun;7(2):130-4 - PubMed
  11. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Mar;32(3):230-6 - PubMed
  12. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995 May;33(3):330-4 - PubMed
  13. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005 Feb 25;2(1):2 - PubMed
  14. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999 Jun;7(2):135-9 - PubMed
  15. Aerosp Med. 1966 Dec;37(12):1208-12 - PubMed
  16. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1986 Dec;33(12):1157-65 - PubMed
  17. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Sep;83(9):1266-73 - PubMed
  18. Med Eng Phys. 2008 Jan;30(1):123-33 - PubMed
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Jul;64(6):896-9 - PubMed
  20. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Jul;43(4):443-50 - PubMed
  21. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):387-98 - PubMed
  22. Eur Heart J. 1997 Sep;18(9):1396-403 - PubMed
  23. Crit Care Med. 1986 Oct;14(10):904-9 - PubMed
  24. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2003 May-Jun;22(3):25 - PubMed
  25. J Biomech. 2004 Jan;37(1):121-6 - PubMed
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Dec;26(12):1516-23 - PubMed
  27. Knee. 2009 Mar;16(2):136-42 - PubMed

Publication Types