Front Pediatr. 2013 Oct 28;1:33. doi: 10.3389/fped.2013.00033. eCollection 2013.
Congestive heart failure: experimental model.
Frontiers in pediatrics
Antonio Francesco Corno, Xue Cai, Caroline B Jones, Giuseppina Mondani, Mark R Boyett, Jonathan Charles Jarvis, George Hart
Affiliations
Affiliations
- School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia , Kubang Kerian, Kelantan , Malaysia.
- Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
- Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK ; Alder Hey Children NHS Foundation Trust , Liverpool , UK.
- John Moores University , Liverpool , UK.
PMID: 24400279
PMCID: PMC3864258 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2013.00033
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surgically induced, combined volume and pressure overload has been used in rabbits to create a simplified and reproducible model of acute left ventricular (LV) failure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: New Zealand white male rabbits (n = 24, mean weight 3.1 ± 0.2 kg) were randomly assigned to either the Control group (n = 10) or to the Heart Failure group (HF, n = 14). Animals in the Control group underwent "sham" procedures. Animals in the HF group underwent procedures to induce LV volume overload by inducing severe aortic valve regurgitation with aortic cusp disruption and pressure overload using an occlusive silver clip positioned around the pre-renal abdominal aorta.
RESULTS: Following Procedure-1 (volume overload) echocardiography confirmed severe aortic regurgitation in all animals in the HF group, with increased mean pulse pressure difference from 18 ± 3 to 38 ± 3 mmHg (P < 0.0001). After Procedure-2 (pressure overload) all animals in the HF group showed clinical and echocardiographic signs of constriction of the abdominal aorta and echocardiography confirmed progressively declining LV function. At the end of the protocol there was a significant increase of the heart/body weight ratio in the HF group vs. Control group (4.6 ± 0.2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.1 g/kg, P < 0.05), and echocardiography showed in HF group significant increase of the LV end-diastolic diameter (2.15 ± 0.09 vs. 1.49 ± 0.03 cm, P < 0.001) and reduction of the LV shortening fraction (26.3 ± 3.8 vs. 41.3 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This experimental model: (a) consistently produces LV hypertrophy/dilatation and subsequent congestive heart failure, (b) provides new data on the time course of LV dilatation, hypertrophy and failure, (c) allows study of the progress and evolution of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction in the presence of induced LV failure, (d) is suitable to study intervention or pharmacological administration to reduce the negative effects of acute LV failure.
Keywords: congestive heart failure; experimental research; left heart failure; ventricular dilatation; ventricular hyprtrophy
References
- J Nucl Cardiol. 1997 Jan-Feb;4(1 Pt 1):25-32 - PubMed
- Am Surg. 1977 Dec;43(12):771-7 - PubMed
- Cardiovasc Res. 2005 Jan 1;65(1):83-92 - PubMed
- Blood Press. 2010 Apr;19(2):119-25 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11):1477-83 - PubMed
- J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):806-815.e1 - PubMed
- Am J Ther. 1998 May;5(3):139-46 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Dec;297(6):H2044-53 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002 Jan-Feb;29(1-2):26-31 - PubMed
- Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000 Apr;33(4):431-8 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol. 1992 Jul;263(1 Pt 2):H226-33 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Jan 15;304(2):H282-93 - PubMed
- J Card Fail. 2013 Jul;19(7):478-93 - PubMed
- Hypertension. 1997 Apr;29(4):1025-30 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Apr;294(4):H1888-95 - PubMed
- Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1995 May;209(1):32-7 - PubMed
- J Hypertens. 1998 May;16(5):657-64 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol. 1994 Aug;267(2 Pt 2):H556-62 - PubMed
- Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013 Sep;10(3):190-7 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Jun;300(6):R1468-75 - PubMed
- J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 Jul;21(4):478-86 - PubMed
- Pharmacol Rep. 2010 Sep-Oct;62(5):874-82 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Feb;112(3):362-6 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol. 1991 Aug;261(2 Pt 2):H301-7 - PubMed
- Circ Res. 1975 Aug;37(2):183-90 - PubMed
- Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Sep;15(9):393 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2000 Jun 27;101(25):2975-80 - PubMed
- J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11(1):128-34 - PubMed
- Pharmacol Res. 2003 Jul;48(1):17-24 - PubMed
- Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;432:71-82 - PubMed
- Life Sci. 2006 Jul 4;79(6):596-600 - PubMed
- J Pharm Pharmacol. 2002 Jan;54(1):139-46 - PubMed
- J Pharmacol Sci. 2010;114(3):311-9 - PubMed
- Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;94(4):430-2 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35299 - PubMed
- J Invest Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;16(1):35-44 - PubMed
- Int J Exp Pathol. 1994 Jun;75(3):179-90 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011 Sep;301(3):F615-21 - PubMed
- Cardiovasc Res. 1994 Oct;28(10):1547-54 - PubMed
- Cardiology. 1998 Oct;90(2):101-9 - PubMed
- Am Heart J. 2013 Aug;166(2):349-56 - PubMed
- Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;90(1):1-12 - PubMed
Publication Types