Display options
Share it on

Iran J Microbiol. 2013 Sep;5(3):209-14.

Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection of Bordetella pertussis isolated from patients in Iran.

Iranian journal of microbiology

Vajiheh Sadat Nikbin, Fereshteh Shahcheraghi, Masoumeh Nakhost Lotfi, Seyyed Mohsen Zahraei, Masoumeh Parzadeh

Affiliations

  1. Pertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran.
  2. Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 24475325 PMCID: PMC3895556

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Due to contagiousness of pertussis, a rapid and sensitive method for diagnosis is required to initiate the treatment and interrupt its transmission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: To detect B. pertussis strains, we used two real-time PCR targeting IS481 and BP283 sequences and compared factors influencing culture and real-time PCR results.

RESULTS: Totally, 779 specimens were collected from patients among which 11 (1.4%) were culture positive. Using IS481 and BP283 primers, 122 (15.6%) and 100 (12.8%) were diagnosed as infected specimens respectively. There were significant relationships between the real-time PCR method for diagnosis of B. pertussis and age, sex and vaccination of patients before sampling.

CONCLUSION: The real-time PCR is superior and much more sensitive than culture for diagnosis of B. pertussis. However, the sensitivity was improved when both IS481 and BP283 were used. Correct sampling and transportation of specimen also improved the detection rate in our research.

Keywords: BP283; Bordetella pertussis; IS481; real-time PCR

References

  1. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 May-Jun;5(3):441-3 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Aug;43(8):3681-7 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1963-6 - PubMed
  4. J Med Microbiol. 2004 Jun;53(Pt 6):519-525 - PubMed
  5. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 23;6:62 - PubMed
  6. J Med Microbiol. 2001 May;50(5):436-440 - PubMed
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Apr-Jun;3(2):175-8 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4396-403 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3636-8 - PubMed
  10. J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jul;56(Pt 7):918-920 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):506-11 - PubMed
  12. APMIS. 2010 Sep 1;118(9):685-91 - PubMed
  13. Infect Immun. 1998 Feb;66(2):670-5 - PubMed
  14. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1999 Feb;21(1):55-63 - PubMed
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Dec 15;39(12):1802-9 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;18(10):748-50 - PubMed
  17. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Jul;3(7):413-8 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):30-5 - PubMed
  19. Epidemiol Infect. 2004 Apr;132(2):185-93 - PubMed
  20. J Med Microbiol. 2006 Aug;55(Pt 8):1043-1051 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1719-22 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Sep;37(9):2872-6 - PubMed
  23. J Med Microbiol. 2009 Aug;58(Pt 8):1023-1029 - PubMed
  24. J Bacteriol. 1997 Nov;179(21):6609-17 - PubMed
  25. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Feb;6(2):141-4 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;44(12):4577-83 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):347-50 - PubMed
  28. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996 Apr;12(2):91-3 - PubMed
  29. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jun;38(6):2330-3 - PubMed
  30. Vaccine. 2007 Jan 15;25(5):918-26 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Dec;38(12):4499-502 - PubMed
  32. J Infect Dis. 2003 Apr 15;187(8):1200-5 - PubMed
  33. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Mar;17(3):365-70 - PubMed
  34. Nat Genet. 2003 Sep;35(1):32-40 - PubMed
  35. J Mol Evol. 1987;26(1-2):74-86 - PubMed
  36. J Med Microbiol. 2004 Aug;53(Pt 8):749-754 - PubMed
  37. CMAJ. 2005 Feb 15;172(4):509-15 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3798-9 - PubMed
  39. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Oct;46(10):3228-31 - PubMed
  40. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2008 Sep;9(3):201-11; quiz 211-2 - PubMed

Publication Types