Display options
Share it on

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Jan 30;10:201-16. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S50248. eCollection 2014.

A randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment

Gang Wang, Alexander McIntyre, Willie R Earley, Shane R Raines, Hans Eriksson

Affiliations

  1. Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Penticton Regional Hospital, Penticton, BC, Canada.
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  4. AstraZeneca R&D, Södertälje, Sweden.

PMID: 24511235 PMCID: PMC3916085 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S50248

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a 10-week (8-week active treatment/2-week post-treatment) randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study (D1448C00004). Patients received quetiapine XR 150 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, or placebo; patients with an inadequate response (<20% improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score) at week two received double-dose treatment. The primary end point was week eight change from randomization in MADRS total score. Secondary end points included MADRS response (≥50% improvement) and remission (score ≤8); Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total and item 1; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety total, psychic, and somatic; Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness total; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global; and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form percentage maximum total scores. Tolerability was assessed throughout.

RESULTS: A total of 471 patients was randomized. No significant improvements in MADRS total score were observed at week eight (last observation carried forward) with either active treatment (quetiapine XR, -17.21 [P=0.174]; escitalopram, -16.73 [P=0.346]) versus placebo (-15.61). There were no significant differences in secondary end points versus placebo, with the exception of week-eight change in PSQI global score (quetiapine XR, -4.96 [P<0.01] versus placebo, -3.37). Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of observed-case data suggested that the primary analysis may not be robust. Most commonly reported adverse events included dry mouth, somnolence, and dizziness for quetiapine XR, and headache and nausea for escitalopram.

CONCLUSION: In this study, neither quetiapine XR (150/300 mg/day) nor escitalopram (10/20 mg/day) showed significant separation from placebo. Both compounds have been shown previously to be effective in the treatment of MDD; possible reasons for this failed study are discussed. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated, with a profile similar to that reported previously.

Keywords: Phase III; antidepressive agents (pharmacological action); antipsychotic agents; clinical trial; sustained-release preparations; treatment efficacy

References

  1. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 - PubMed
  2. Psychother Psychosom. 2003 May-Jun;72(3):115-27 - PubMed
  3. Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Jul 15;44(2):77-87 - PubMed
  4. Clin Ther. 2003 Aug;25(8):2289-304 - PubMed
  5. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;13(7):917-32 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;70(4):526-39 - PubMed
  7. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62 - PubMed
  8. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Aug;14(7):863-75 - PubMed
  9. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1017-27 - PubMed
  10. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5 - PubMed
  11. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;176:363-8 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57 - PubMed
  13. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Oct;27(10):964-76 - PubMed
  14. Curr Top Med Chem. 2005;5(11):1077-86 - PubMed
  15. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):851-64 - PubMed
  16. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1970;212:11-9 - PubMed
  17. Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):596-601 - PubMed
  18. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 - PubMed
  19. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jan;19(1):34-40 - PubMed
  20. CNS Spectr. 2009 Jun;14(6):299-313 - PubMed
  21. Essent Psychopharmacol. 2005;6(4):221-6 - PubMed
  22. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jan 2;134(1):47-60 - PubMed
  23. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Feb;27(1):1-5 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;70(4):540-9 - PubMed
  25. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;159(2):191-200 - PubMed
  26. Br J Psychiatry. 1989 May;154:672-6 - PubMed
  27. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;21(8):769-84 - PubMed
  28. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Dec;37(13):2830-6 - PubMed
  29. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):321-6 - PubMed
  30. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(4):731-45 - PubMed
  31. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2008 Oct;46(10):21-4 - PubMed
  32. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;67(11):1741-6 - PubMed
  33. J Affect Disord. 2011 Jan;128(1-2):83-94 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support