Display options
Cite
Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily M, Pasbakhsh P, Amidi F, et al. Comparison of differentiation potential of male mouse adipose tissue and bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(12):965-76
Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily, M., Pasbakhsh, P., Amidi, F., Mehrannia, K., & Sobhani, A. (2013). Comparison of differentiation potential of male mouse adipose tissue and bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine, 11(12), 965-76.
Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily, Maryam, et al. "Comparison of differentiation potential of male mouse adipose tissue and bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells." Iranian journal of reproductive medicine vol. 11,12 (2013): 965-76.
Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily M, Pasbakhsh P, Amidi F, Mehrannia K, Sobhani A. Comparison of differentiation potential of male mouse adipose tissue and bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Dec;11(12):965-76. PMID: 24639722; PMCID: PMC3941408.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Dec;11(12):965-76.

Comparison of differentiation potential of male mouse adipose tissue and bone marrow derived-mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells.

Iranian journal of reproductive medicine

Maryam Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily, Parichehr Pasbakhsh, Fardin Amidi, Kobra Mehrannia, Aligholi Sobhani

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 24639722 PMCID: PMC3941408

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent publications about differentiation of stem cells to germ cells have motivated researchers to make new approaches to infertility. In vitro production of germ cells improves understanding differentiation process of male and female germ cells. Due to the problem of using embryonic stem cells (ESC), it's necessary the mentioned cells be replaced with some adult multi-potent stem cells in laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to obtain germ cells from appropriate source beyond ESC and compare differential potentials of adipocytes derived stem cells (ADMSCs) with bone marrow derived stem cells (BMMSCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: To find multi-potential entity, after providing purified ADMSCs and BMMSCs, differentiation to osteoblast and adipocyte was confirmed by using appropriate culture medium. To confirm mesenchymal lineage production superficial markers (expression of CD90 and CD44 and non-expression of CD45 and CD31) were investigated by flowcytometry. Then the cells were differentiated to germ cells in inductive medium containing retinoic acid for 7days. To evaluate germ cells characteristic markers [Dazl (Deleted in azoospermia-like), Mvh (Mouse vasa homolog gene), Stra8 (Stimulated by retinoic acid) and Scp3 (Synaptonemal complex protein 3)] flowcytometry, imunoflorescence and real time PCR were used.

RESULTS: Both types of cells were able to differentiate into osteoblast and adipocyte cells and presentation of stem cell superficial markers (CD90, CD44) and absence of endothelial and blood cell markers (CD31, CD45) were confirmative The flowcytometry, imunoflorescence and real time PCR results showed remarkable expression of germ cells characteristic markers (Mvh, Dazl, Stra8, and Scp3).

CONCLUSION: It was found that although ADMSCs were attained easier and also cultured and differentiated rapidly, germ cell markers were expressed in BMMSCs significantly more than ADMSCs. This article extracted from M.Sc. thesis. (Maryam Hosseinzadeh Shirzeily).

Keywords: Germ cells; Infertility; Mesenchymal stem cells; Retinoic acid

References

  1. Stem Cells Dev. 2008 Aug;17(4):761-73 - PubMed
  2. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):43-8 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 2004 Jan 8;427(6970):148-54 - PubMed
  4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Apr 9;316(3):651-8 - PubMed
  5. Stem Cells. 2003;21(5):527-35 - PubMed
  6. Dev Cell. 2006 Jul;11(1):125-32 - PubMed
  7. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):379-90 - PubMed
  8. Dev Biol. 1995 Apr;168(2):683-5 - PubMed
  9. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 May;4(2):80-5 - PubMed
  10. J Med Ethics. 2005 Mar;31(3):184-6 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2003 May 23;300(5623):1251-6 - PubMed
  12. Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1359-70 - PubMed
  13. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5338 - PubMed
  14. Mol Cell. 2000 Jan;5(1):73-83 - PubMed
  15. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;63:69-76 - PubMed
  16. Cell Transplant. 2010;19(2):193-202 - PubMed
  17. Lab Invest. 2006 Jul;86(7):654-63 - PubMed
  18. Differentiation. 2009 Sep-Oct;78(2-3):116-23 - PubMed
  19. Immunol Lett. 2003 Oct 31;89(2-3):267-70 - PubMed
  20. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Oct;8(10):755-65 - PubMed
  21. Stem Cells Dev. 2011 Jun;20(6):1079-88 - PubMed
  22. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Jan;42(1):162-5 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 30;100(20):11457-62 - PubMed
  24. Tissue Eng. 2001 Apr;7(2):211-28 - PubMed
  25. Cell. 2005 Dec 2;123(5):917-29 - PubMed
  26. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2011 Sep;47(8):521-5 - PubMed
  27. Nat Genet. 2002 Dec;32(4):557-8 - PubMed
  28. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):99-105 - PubMed
  29. Science. 2006 Apr 28;312(5773):596-600 - PubMed
  30. Neuroreport. 2008 Jul 2;19(10):1015-9 - PubMed
  31. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7 - PubMed
  32. Biol Reprod. 2012 Feb 14;86(2):35 - PubMed
  33. Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Jul 15;13(14):1451-60 - PubMed
  34. Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Apr 1;13(7):727-39 - PubMed
  35. Stem Cells. 2006 Jan;24(1):139-44 - PubMed
  36. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Jan;276(1):75-102 - PubMed
  37. Br J Haematol. 2003 Nov;123(4):702-11 - PubMed

Publication Types