Display options
Share it on

Autism Res Treat. 2014;2014:964704. doi: 10.1155/2014/964704. Epub 2014 Mar 10.

Measuring outcome in an early intervention program for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: use of a curriculum-based assessment.

Autism research and treatment

Elizabeth C Bacon, Sarah Dufek, Laura Schreibman, Aubyn C Stahmer, Karen Pierce, Eric Courchesne

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA.
  2. Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, 21 Bloomingdale Road, Rogers Building, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
  3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA ; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center and Autism Discovery Institute, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, 3020 Children's Way, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.
  4. Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

PMID: 24711926 PMCID: PMC3966353 DOI: 10.1155/2014/964704

Abstract

Measuring progress of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) during intervention programs is a challenge faced by researchers and clinicians. Typically, standardized assessments of child development are used within research settings to measure the effects of early intervention programs. However, the use of standardized assessments is not without limitations, including lack of sensitivity of some assessments to measure small or slow progress, testing constraints that may affect the child's performance, and the lack of information provided by the assessments that can be used to guide treatment planning. The utility of a curriculum-based assessment is discussed in comparison to the use of standardized assessments to measure child functioning and progress throughout an early intervention program for toddlers with risk for ASD. Scores derived from the curriculum-based assessment were positively correlated with standardized assessments, captured progress masked by standardized assessments, and early scores were predictive of later outcomes. These results support the use of a curriculum-based assessment as an additional and appropriate method for measuring child progress in an early intervention program. Further benefits of the use of curriculum-based measures for use within community settings are discussed.

References

  1. Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Sep;35(5):593-602 - PubMed
  2. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Feb;55(1):3-9 - PubMed
  3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1420-30 - PubMed
  4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):667-81 - PubMed
  5. Res Dev Disabil. 2007 Mar-Apr;28(2):207-18 - PubMed
  6. J Autism Dev Disord. 1997 Jun;27(3):233-43 - PubMed
  7. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2004;10(3):162-8 - PubMed
  8. Brain Dev. 2003 Dec;25(8):546-8 - PubMed
  9. J Pediatr. 2011 Sep;159(3):458-465.e1-6 - PubMed
  10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 May;46(5):500-13 - PubMed
  11. Res Dev Disabil. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):287-303 - PubMed
  12. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Aug;41(8):1007-18 - PubMed
  13. Child Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;12(4-5):269-77 - PubMed
  14. J Autism Dev Disord. 1987 Jun;17(2):187-200 - PubMed
  15. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 1998 Mar;5(1):27-32 - PubMed
  16. J Posit Behav Interv. 2010 Oct;12(4):245-253 - PubMed
  17. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Nov;43(11):2491-501 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support