Display options
Share it on

Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2010 Oct;71(5):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.10.004.

Comparison of the effects of ketamine or lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough in patients undergoing surgery: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental

Gülen Guler, Recep Aksu, Cihangir Bicer, Zeynep Tosun, Adem Boyaci

Affiliations

  1. Medical Faculty, Department of Anesthesiology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

PMID: 24688150 PMCID: PMC3969624 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.10.004

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl-induced cough is common but has not been viewed as a serious anesthetic problem. However, the cough may be explosive at times, may require immediate intervention, and may be associated with undesirable increases in intracranial, intraocular, and intra-abdominal pressures. Prevention of fentanylinduced cough in such situations is of paramount importance. Ketamine, at concentrations achieved with standard clinical doses, has a direct relaxant effect on airway smooth muscle.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the effects of ketamine or lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough.

METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted at the Erciyes University Medical School, Kayseri, Turkey. Consecutive adult patients aged 18 to 65 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated equally into 3 groups to receive lidocaine 1 mg/kg, ketamine 0.5 μg/kg, or placebo intravenously 1 minute before fentanyl administration. Following intravenous fentanyl (1.5 μg/kg over 2 seconds) injection, an observer, unaware of the type of medication given to the patients, recorded the number of episodes of coughing, if any. Any episode of cough was classified as coughing and graded by investigators blinded to treatment as mild (1-2 coughs), moderate (3-4), or severe (≥5). Blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (SpO2), and adverse effects (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were approached for inclusion; 300 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. No patients in the ketamine group had cough. The frequency of cough was significantly lower in the lidocaine (11/100 [11%]; P = 0.024) and ketamine (0/100; P = 0.001) groups compared with the placebo group (23/100 [23%]). The intensity of cough was significantly lower in the lidocaine (mild, 7/100 [7%]; moderate, 4/100 [4%]; P = 0.037) and ketamine (0/100; P < 0.001) groups compared with the placebo group (mild, 10/100 [10%]; moderate, 12/100 [12%]; severe, 1/100 [1%]). Severe cough (≥5) was observed in 1 patient in the placebo group. Incidence and intensity of cough were significantly decreased in the ketamine group compared with the lidocaine group (incidence, P = 0.001; intensity, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, and AEs.

CONCLUSION: Intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) significantly reduced the reflex cough induced by fentanyl compared with lidocaine and placebo, and was well tolerated.

Keywords: coughing; fentanyl; ketamine; lidocaine

References

  1. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):309-12 - PubMed
  2. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Mar;50(3):297-300 - PubMed
  3. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):172-5 - PubMed
  4. Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62 Suppl 1:48-53 - PubMed
  5. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):670-674 - PubMed
  6. Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):932-40 - PubMed
  7. Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jun;64(6):682-7 - PubMed
  8. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;77(2):217-22 - PubMed
  9. Anesthesiology. 1979 May;50(5):470-2 - PubMed
  10. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Sep;65(3):1007-23 - PubMed
  11. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jun;92(6):1442-3 - PubMed
  12. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):654-9 - PubMed
  13. Neuroscience. 1995 Apr;65(4):943-6 - PubMed
  14. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Apr;38(3):330-4 - PubMed
  15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):862-5 - PubMed
  16. J Physiol. 1988 Aug;402:411-20 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989 Sep 13;168(2):153-8 - PubMed
  18. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;26(9):985-1028 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Feb;19(1):53-6 - PubMed
  20. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Dec;43(12):1216-9 - PubMed
  21. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(3):511-32 - PubMed
  22. Anaesthesia. 1990 Jan;45(1):18-21 - PubMed
  23. Anesth Analg. 1994 Jan;78(1):17-22 - PubMed
  24. Anesth Analg. 1997 Mar;84(3):641-7 - PubMed
  25. Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1696-1698 - PubMed
  26. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jan;82(1):87-9 - PubMed
  27. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Sep;52(8):1071-5 - PubMed
  28. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Nov;14(7):494-9 - PubMed
  29. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Dec;63(6):692-5 - PubMed
  30. Anesth Analg. 1998 Dec;87(6):1383-8 - PubMed
  31. Anesth Analg. 1978 Jan-Feb;57(1):31-6 - PubMed
  32. Anesth Analg. 1995 Jul;81(1):57-62 - PubMed

Publication Types