Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 20;5:229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00229. eCollection 2014.

Task demands modulate decision and eye movement responses in the chimeric face test: examining the right hemisphere processing account.

Frontiers in psychology

Jason C Coronel, Kara D Federmeier

Affiliations

  1. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  2. Department of Psychology, Program in Neurosciences, and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Champaign, IL, USA.

PMID: 24688475 PMCID: PMC3960575 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00229

Abstract

A large and growing body of work, conducted in both brain-intact and brain-damaged populations, has used the free viewing chimeric face test as a measure of hemispheric dominance for the extraction of emotional information from faces. These studies generally show that normal right-handed individuals tend to perceive chimeric faces as more emotional if the emotional expression is presented on the half of the face to the viewer's left ("left hemiface"). However, the mechanisms underlying this lateralized bias remain unclear. Here, we examine the extent to which this bias is driven by right hemisphere processing advantages vs. default scanning biases in a unique way-by changing task demands. In particular, we compare the original task with one in which right-hemisphere-biased processing cannot provide a decision advantage. Our behavioral and eye movement data are inconsistent with the predictions of a default scanning bias account and support the idea that the left hemiface bias found in the chimeric face test is largely due to strategic use of right hemisphere processing mechanisms.

Keywords: chimeric face test; eye movements; lateralization of emotion; right hemisphere processing account; scanning bias

References

  1. Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):491-505 - PubMed
  2. Cortex. 2011 Jun;47(6):690-5 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976 Aug;2(3):299-312 - PubMed
  4. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5307 - PubMed
  5. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):793-802 - PubMed
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975 Aug;1(3):246-52 - PubMed
  7. Cortex. 1982 Jul;18(2):211-25 - PubMed
  8. Brain Cogn. 1983 Oct;2(4):404-19 - PubMed
  9. Brain Lang. 2000 Jun 15;73(2):236-53 - PubMed
  10. Neuropsychology. 2012 Sep;26(5):551-67 - PubMed
  11. Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):77-94 - PubMed
  12. Laterality. 2008 Jan;13(1):92-103 - PubMed
  13. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Jun;31(6):621-4 - PubMed
  14. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):562-77 - PubMed
  15. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Aug;70(2):453-69 - PubMed
  16. Brain Res. 2006 Dec 8;1124(1):96-9 - PubMed
  17. Laterality. 2008 Jul;13(4):374-86 - PubMed
  18. Neuroreport. 2005 Dec 19;16(18):1991-3 - PubMed
  19. Science. 2003 Jul 18;301(5631):384-6 - PubMed
  20. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2005 Mar;4(1):3-20 - PubMed
  21. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):513-25 - PubMed
  22. Brain Cogn. 1988 Oct;8(2):178-88 - PubMed
  23. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9 - PubMed
  24. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Feb;15(2):229-37 - PubMed
  25. Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Feb;116(1):106-17 - PubMed
  26. Neuropsychologia. 1997 May;35(5):685-93 - PubMed
  27. Mem Cognit. 1989 Nov;17(6):770-6 - PubMed
  28. Brain Cogn. 2003 Aug;52(3):353-63 - PubMed
  29. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 - PubMed
  30. Laterality. 2005 Jan;10(1):51-64 - PubMed
  31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):69-80 - PubMed
  32. Neuron. 1995 Feb;14(2):217-28 - PubMed
  33. Brain Cogn. 1991 May;16(1):83-103 - PubMed
  34. Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(10):1277-87 - PubMed
  35. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(1):52-9 - PubMed
  36. Neuropsychology. 2000 Jan;14(1):41-59 - PubMed
  37. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Oct;7(5):1031-58 - PubMed
  38. Psychol Med. 2003 May;33(4):739-45 - PubMed
  39. Percept Mot Skills. 1966 Dec;23(3):1127-34 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support