Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 03;5:271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00271. eCollection 2014.

The ARSQ 2.0 reveals age and personality effects on mind-wandering experiences.

Frontiers in psychology

B Alexander Diaz, Sophie Van Der Sluis, Jeroen S Benjamins, Diederick Stoffers, Richard Hardstone, Huibert D Mansvelder, Eus J W Van Someren, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  2. Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University Amsterdam and VU Medical Center Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  3. Department of Sleep and Cognition,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  4. Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Sleep and Cognition,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  5. Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Sleep and Cognition,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.

PMID: 24772097 PMCID: PMC3982068 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00271

Abstract

The human brain frequently generates thoughts and feelings detached from environmental demands. Investigating the rich repertoire of these mind-wandering experiences is challenging, as it depends on introspection and mapping its content requires an unknown number of dimensions. We recently developed a retrospective self-report questionnaire-the Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire (ARSQ)-which quantifies mind wandering along seven dimensions: "Discontinuity of Mind," "Theory of Mind," "Self," "Planning," "Sleepiness," "Comfort," and "Somatic Awareness." Here, we show using confirmatory factor analysis that the ARSQ can be simplified by standardizing the number of items per factor and extending it to a 10-dimensional model, adding "Health Concern," "Visual Thought," and "Verbal Thought." We will refer to this extended ARSQ as the "ARSQ 2.0." Testing for effects of age and gender revealed no main effect for gender, yet a moderate and significant negative effect for age on the dimensions of "Self," "Planning," and "Visual Thought." Interestingly, we observed stable and significant test-retest correlations across measurement intervals of 3-32 months except for "Sleepiness" and "Health Concern." To investigate whether this stability could be related to personality traits, we correlated ARSQ scores to proxy measures of Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory, revealing multiple significant associations for the trait "Self-Directedness." Other traits correlated to specific ARSQ dimensions, e.g., a negative association between "Harm Avoidance" and "Comfort." Together, our results suggest that the ARSQ 2.0 is a promising instrument for quantitative studies on mind wandering and its relation to other psychological or physiological phenomena.

Keywords: Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire (ARSQ); consciousness; mind wandering; personality traits; test-retest reliability

References

  1. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 29;7:409 - PubMed
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26 - PubMed
  3. Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):55-64 - PubMed
  4. Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):932 - PubMed
  5. J Pers. 2006 Apr;74(2):479-510 - PubMed
  6. Eur Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;20(2):188-92 - PubMed
  7. Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):798-810 - PubMed
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jun;80(6):1011-27 - PubMed
  9. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1970 Feb;32(2):242-52 - PubMed
  10. Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):3-12 - PubMed
  11. Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):924-35 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958 - PubMed
  13. J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 2;25(44):10131-7 - PubMed
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):322-35 - PubMed
  15. Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):188-197 - PubMed
  16. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Aug;21(4):424-30 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24 - PubMed
  18. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;53(2):201-7 - PubMed
  19. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):975-90 - PubMed
  20. Am Sci. 1974 Jul-Aug;62(4):417-25 - PubMed
  21. Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1847-60 - PubMed
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1614-9 - PubMed
  23. Br J Psychiatry. 1975 Apr;126:346-53 - PubMed
  24. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 08;7:446 - PubMed
  25. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jun 06;5:56 - PubMed
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57 - PubMed
  27. Int J Psychophysiol. 1995 Feb;19(1):41-52 - PubMed
  28. Brain Res Bull. 2010 Apr 5;81(6):565-73 - PubMed

Publication Types