Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e12669. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.12669. Epub 2014 Jan 05.
Correlation of Body Mass Index and Serum Parameters With Ultrasonographic Grade of Fatty Change in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Iranian Red Crescent medical journal
Ghobad Abangah, Atefeh Yousefi, Rouhangiz Asadollahi, Yousef Veisani, Paria Rahimifar, Sajjad Alizadeh
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
- Student Research Committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
- Department of Pathology, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
PMID: 24719704
PMCID: PMC3964422 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.12669
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common liver disease in the western population and expanding disease in the world. Pathological changes in fatty liver are like alcohol liver damage, which can lead to end-stage liver disease. The prevalence of NAFLD in obese or overweight people is higher than general population, and it seems that people with high Body Mass Index (BMI) or abnormality in some laboratory tests are more susceptible for severe fatty liver and high grade of NAFLD in ultrasonography (U.S).
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of BMI and laboratory tests with NAFLD in ultrasonography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a multi-step process, we selected two-hundred and thirteen cases from four hundred and eighteen patients with NAFLD. Laboratory tests performed included: ALT, AST, FBS, Triglyceride and cholesterol levels, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, ceruloplasmin, serum iron, TIBC, transferrin saturation, ferritin, AMA, ANA, ANTI LKM1, serum protein electrophoresis, TSH, anti TTG (IgA). BMI and ultrasonography for 213 patients were performed, and then data was analyzed. These parameters and grades of ultrasonography were compared with the values obtained using one way ANOVA. An ordinal logistic regression model was used to estimate the probability of ultrasonography grade. The Statistical Package for the Social Science program (SPSS, version 16.0) was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirteen cases including 140 male and 73 female, were studied. In general, 72.3% of patients were overweight and obese. Post-hoc tests showed that only BMI (P < 0.001) and TG (P < 0.011) among variables had statistically significant associations with ultrasonography grade (USG), and ordinal logistic regression model showed that BMI and AST were the best predictors.
DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that in patients with NAFLD, BMI and TG are most effective factors in severity of fatty liver disease and ultrasonography grade (USG). On the other hand, BMI as a predictor can be helpful. But, AST has not been a reliable finding, because it changes in many conditions.
Keywords: Aspartate Aminotransferase; Body Mass Index; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Triglyceride; Ultrasonography
References
- Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009 Apr;5(2):371-4 - PubMed
- Ann Hepatol. 2011 Apr-Jun;10(2):125-32 - PubMed
- Arq Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan-Mar;49(1):89-96 - PubMed
- Ann Hepatol. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):161-3 - PubMed
- Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 May;4(2):173-7 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1413-9 - PubMed
- J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May;18(5):588-94 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):71-9 - PubMed
- Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;18(3):233-7 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1989 Aug;172(2):389-92 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2003 Nov;26(11):3160-7 - PubMed
- Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007 Dec;6(6):572-8 - PubMed
- Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May;15(5):539-43 - PubMed
- J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Oct;18(5):365-70 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2002 Dec 17;106(25):3143-421 - PubMed
- J Transl Med. 2008 Nov 27;6:72 - PubMed
- Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:450639 - PubMed
- Semin Liver Dis. 2008 Nov;28(4):339-50 - PubMed
- Arch Iran Med. 2008 Nov;11(6):602-7 - PubMed
- Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012 Oct;11(5):513-20 - PubMed
- Clin Sci (Lond). 2008 Sep;115(5):141-50 - PubMed
- Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012 Aug;124(15-16):526-31 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1705-25 - PubMed
- Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1):37-45 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 18;346(16):1221-31 - PubMed
- Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Dec;38(12):2145-50 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1702-4 - PubMed
- J Hepatol. 2010 Apr;52(4):579-85 - PubMed
- Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:145754 - PubMed
- Hepatology. 1995 Dec;22(6):1714-9 - PubMed
- Hepatol Res. 2014 May;44(5):515-22 - PubMed
- Dig Dis. 2010;28(1):155-61 - PubMed
- J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;27(10):1555-60 - PubMed
- Lipids. 2010 Apr;45(4):321-7 - PubMed
- Semin Liver Dis. 2004 Nov;24(4):349-62 - PubMed
- J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(6):376-84 - PubMed
- Hepatology. 2004 Oct;40(4):820-6 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Sep;28(6):535-41 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jan 15;126(2):137-45 - PubMed
- Metabolism. 2006 Dec;55(12):1604-9 - PubMed
- Liver Int. 2009 Jan;29(1):113-9 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 2002 Sep;123(3):745-50 - PubMed
- Med Pregl. 2013 Jan-Feb;66(1-2):24-31 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S11-61 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2010 May 10;10:237 - PubMed
- Semin Liver Dis. 2001;21(1):3-16 - PubMed
- Mod Pathol. 1998 Jun;11(6):560-5 - PubMed
Publication Types