Display options
Share it on

Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Feb;16(2):e13938. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.13938. Epub 2014 Feb 05.

Comparison of Prediction Between TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) Risk Score and Modified TIMI Risk Score in Discharged Patients From Emergency Department With Atypical Chest Pain.

Iranian Red Crescent medical journal

Mohsen Abbasnezhad, Hassan Soleimanpour, Mohamadreza Sasaie, Samad Ej Golzari, Saeid Safari, Maryam Soleimanpour, Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
  2. Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
  3. Students' Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
  4. Medical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
  5. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
  6. Gastroenterology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
  7. Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.

PMID: 24719735 PMCID: PMC3965868 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.13938

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is one of the most common causes of the admission to the emergency departments. It, however, can be due to numerous diseases some of which are life threatening.

OBJECTIVES: In the current study, we evaluated the prognostic value of TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) and Modified TIMI risk scores to stratify the risk for patients with atypical chest pain being discharged from the emergency department.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective-analytic study, we collected data from 1020 patients with atypical chest pain enrolled to the study. All eligible patients were visited by the emergency medicine residents who were trained for this study. Based on the criteria in both systems, the emergency medicine attending decided on either discharging or hospitalizing patients. Patients were allocated into 2 equal groups randomly. In order to predict the opposing accidents in 30 days (coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death) TIMI risk scores and Modified TIMI risk scores were assessed based on TIMI risk score (0 or 1) and Modified TIMI risk score (0 or 1).

RESULTS: No significant difference could be observed between both groups regarding demographic characteristics, ejection fraction, left ventricle hypertrophy, TRS criteria, risk factors and the history of coronary artery stenosis. None of the atypical chest pain patients discharged based on TIMI and modified TIMI risk scores experienced any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained from this study support the idea that the TIMI and modified TIMI risk scores might be valuable tools that could be used to stratify the risk of patients with atypical chest pain in the emergency department.

Keywords: Atypical Chest Pain; Emergency Department; Myocardial Infarction; Thrombolysis

References

  1. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Jun;10(2):64-8 - PubMed
  2. Emerg Med J. 2009 Feb;26(2):95-9 - PubMed
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75 - PubMed
  4. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):13-8 - PubMed
  5. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Oct;24(2):137-44 - PubMed
  6. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):252-9 - PubMed
  7. Emerg Med J. 2013 Jan;30(1):15-8 - PubMed
  8. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):439-45 - PubMed
  9. Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):E329-34 - PubMed
  10. ARYA Atheroscler. 2010 Summer;6(2):69-73 - PubMed
  11. Heart. 2006 Sep;92(9):1333-4 - PubMed
  12. Resuscitation. 2007 Jul;74(1):90-3 - PubMed

Publication Types