Display options
Cite
Kukuczka B, Magneschi L, Petroutsos D, et al. Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Is Crucial for Acclimation to Anoxia and Complementary to Nonphotochemical Quenching in Stress Adaptation. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(4):1604-1617doi: 10.1104/pp.114.240648.
Kukuczka, B., Magneschi, L., Petroutsos, D., Steinbeck, J., Bald, T., Powikrowska, M., Fufezan, C., Finazzi, G., & Hippler, M. (2014). Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Is Crucial for Acclimation to Anoxia and Complementary to Nonphotochemical Quenching in Stress Adaptation. Plant physiology, 165(4), 1604-1617. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.240648
Kukuczka, Bernadeta, et al. "Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Is Crucial for Acclimation to Anoxia and Complementary to Nonphotochemical Quenching in Stress Adaptation." Plant physiology vol. 165,4 (2014): 1604-1617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.240648
Kukuczka B, Magneschi L, Petroutsos D, Steinbeck J, Bald T, Powikrowska M, Fufezan C, Finazzi G, Hippler M. Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Is Crucial for Acclimation to Anoxia and Complementary to Nonphotochemical Quenching in Stress Adaptation. Plant Physiol. 2014 Aug;165(4):1604-1617. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.240648. Epub 2014 Jun 19. PMID: 24948831; PMCID: PMC4119042.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Plant Physiol. 2014 Aug;165(4):1604-1617. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.240648. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Is Crucial for Acclimation to Anoxia and Complementary to Nonphotochemical Quenching in Stress Adaptation.

Plant physiology

Bernadeta Kukuczka, Leonardo Magneschi, Dimitris Petroutsos, Janina Steinbeck, Till Bald, Marta Powikrowska, Christian Fufezan, Giovanni Finazzi, Michael Hippler

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Muenster, Germany (B.K., L.M., D.P., J.S., T.B., C.F., M.H.);Centre National Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte Recherche 5168, Laboratoire Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et Energies Alternatives, l'Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Institut National Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte Recherche 1200, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38041 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.); andDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg C 1871, Denmark (M.P.).
  2. Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Münster, 48143 Muenster, Germany (B.K., L.M., D.P., J.S., T.B., C.F., M.H.);Centre National Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte Recherche 5168, Laboratoire Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et Energies Alternatives, l'Institut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Institut National Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte Recherche 1200, F-38054 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.);Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38041 Grenoble, France (D.P., G.F.); andDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg C 1871, Denmark (M.P.) [email protected].

PMID: 24948831 PMCID: PMC4119042 DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.240648

Abstract

To investigate the functional importance of Proton Gradient Regulation5-Like1 (PGRL1) for photosynthetic performances in the moss Physcomitrella patens, we generated a pgrl1 knockout mutant. Functional analysis revealed diminished nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) as well as decreased capacity for cyclic electron flow (CEF) in pgrl1. Under anoxia, where CEF is induced, quantitative proteomics evidenced severe down-regulation of photosystems but up-regulation of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase complex, plastocyanin, and Ca

© 2014 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

References

  1. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Apr;13(4):969-89 - PubMed
  2. J Biol Chem. 2005 May 27;280(21):20431-41 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 - PubMed
  4. Mol Cell. 2013 Feb 7;49(3):511-23 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):11128-33 - PubMed
  6. Nature. 1961 Jul 8;191:144-8 - PubMed
  7. Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):1558-66 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Biochem. 1970 Dec;17(2):319-27 - PubMed
  9. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Mar 14;505(3-4):355-427 - PubMed
  10. Plant Physiol. 2007 Apr;143(4):1802-16 - PubMed
  11. Plant Cell. 2011 Aug;23(8):2950-63 - PubMed
  12. Planta. 2000 Nov;211(6):770-80 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 2009 Nov 26;462(7272):518-21 - PubMed
  14. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Aug;1817(8):1122-6 - PubMed
  15. J Biol Chem. 2009 Nov 20;284(47):32770-81 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Bot. 2013 Jul;64(10):2689-99 - PubMed
  17. Z Naturforsch B. 1969 Dec;24(12):1588-98 - PubMed
  18. New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):279-88 - PubMed
  19. Plant Cell. 2011 Jul;23(7):2619-30 - PubMed
  20. Mol Cells. 1999 Feb 28;9(1):14-9 - PubMed
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12728-33 - PubMed
  22. Plant Cell. 2013 Oct;25(10):3926-43 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9709-13 - PubMed
  24. Photosynth Res. 2012 Sep;113(1-3):191-206 - PubMed
  25. Proteomics. 2007 Oct;7(19):3470-80 - PubMed
  26. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Aug;1807(8):919-26 - PubMed
  27. Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):336-42 - PubMed
  28. J Biol Chem. 2009 Mar 13;284(11):7201-13 - PubMed
  29. EMBO Rep. 2002 Mar;3(3):280-5 - PubMed
  30. Proteomics. 2007 Nov;7(21):3964-79 - PubMed
  31. Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 1;25(7):964-6 - PubMed
  32. Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 15;27(8):1183-4 - PubMed
  33. Photosynth Res. 2010 Nov;106(1-2):19-31 - PubMed
  34. Plant Cell. 2008 Mar;20(3):502-7 - PubMed
  35. Bioinformatics. 2014 Mar 15;30(6):896-8 - PubMed
  36. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug;9(8):1369-1380 - PubMed
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10209-14 - PubMed
  38. Plant Physiol. 2014 May;165(1):438-52 - PubMed
  39. Bioinformatics. 2012 Apr 1;28(7):1052-3 - PubMed
  40. Planta. 2000 Feb;210(3):468-77 - PubMed
  41. Plant Cell. 2013 Sep;25(9):3519-34 - PubMed
  42. Planta. 1985 Aug;165(3):354-8 - PubMed
  43. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 May 7;272(1566):877-86 - PubMed
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Feb 15;49:266-70 - PubMed
  45. Plant Physiol. 2012 Mar;158(3):1293-305 - PubMed
  46. Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):58-63 - PubMed
  47. New Phytol. 2008;179(3):675-686 - PubMed
  48. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Oct;12(10):2774-90 - PubMed
  49. Nature. 2000 Jan 27;403(6768):391-5 - PubMed
  50. Nature. 2010 Apr 22;464(7292):1210-3 - PubMed
  51. Front Plant Sci. 2013 May 27;4:161 - PubMed
  52. Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):114-8 - PubMed
  53. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 - PubMed
  54. Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1466-7 - PubMed
  55. J Biol Chem. 1950 Aug;185(2):781-7 - PubMed
  56. Science. 2008 Jan 4;319(5859):64-9 - PubMed
  57. Photosynth Res. 2010 Nov;106(1-2):47-56 - PubMed
  58. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;26:25-30 - PubMed
  59. Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):579-82 - PubMed
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 23;109(43):17717-22 - PubMed
  61. Nature. 1959 Jul 4;184:10-21 - PubMed
  62. Cell. 2008 Jan 25;132(2):273-85 - PubMed
  63. J Proteome Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;3(5):958-64 - PubMed
  64. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:333-359 - PubMed
  65. J Biol Chem. 2011 Jun 17;286(24):21427-39 - PubMed
  66. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011 Jun;52(6):1042-54 - PubMed
  67. Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Jan;60(2):259-75 - PubMed
  68. Cell. 2002 Aug 9;110(3):361-71 - PubMed
  69. Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec;136(4):4265-74 - PubMed
  70. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Jul;9(7):1514-32 - PubMed

Publication Types