Display options
Share it on

Int J Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;5(1):35-8. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

Evaluation of nuchal translucency measurement in first trimester pregnancy.

International journal of fertility & sterility

Mojgan Barati, Mahvash Zargar, Sara Masihi, Sima Taherpour

Affiliations

  1. Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

PMID: 24917922 PMCID: PMC4040241

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant number of pregnancies, particularly in women with previous histories of infertility, are associated with fetal abnormalities. Methods such as the nuchal translucency (NT) measurement enable us to identify more pregnancies with chromosomal abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analytic cross-sectional study was performed in 446 pregnant women at 11-14 weeks gestation, from 2009 to 2010 in the Fetal Medicine Unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. All NT measurements were performed by a certified sonographer using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) recommended protocol. FMF first trimester software was used for primary and secondary (adjusted) risk calculation.

RESULTS: The average maternal age was 28.5 years and 15% of mothers were ≥35 years of age. The average crown rump length (CRL), gestational age and NT thickness were 61.7, 12.4 weeks and 1.75 mm, respectively. There were 20 cases with increased adjusted risk (4.04%) and 4 cases of documented abnormal karyotype.

CONCLUSION: In our study increased adjusted risk was 4.04%.Documented abnormal karyotype were 0.9% and 28% of total and high-risk groups who accepted amniocentesis, respectively. In this study, 50% of women with high-risk results and about half of those with abnormal karyotypes were seen in women under age 35. Knowing these risks is of utmost importance in pregnancy, particularly in patients with infertility histories.

Keywords: Chromosomal Anomaly; Karyotype; Nuchal Translucency

References

  1. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;25(3):221-6 - PubMed
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):6-10 - PubMed
  3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;35(3):292-6 - PubMed
  4. Radiology. 1988 May;167(2):383-5 - PubMed
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;109(5):1040-5 - PubMed
  6. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Oct-Dec;22(4):282-90; quiz 292-3 - PubMed
  7. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Mar;28(3):220-233 - PubMed
  8. Prenat Diagn. 2003 Jun;23(6):496-500 - PubMed
  9. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;17(2):157-9 - PubMed
  10. Heart. 2002 Oct;88(4):387-91 - PubMed
  11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):652-5 - PubMed
  12. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 Sep-Oct;55(5):575-80 - PubMed
  13. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;96(3):328-32 - PubMed
  14. Croat Med J. 2005 Oct;46(5):786-91 - PubMed
  15. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):218-23 - PubMed
  16. Ginekol Pol. 2005 Mar;76(3):179-86 - PubMed
  17. Prenat Diagn. 2002 Oct;22(10):864-8 - PubMed
  18. Harefuah. 2006 Mar;145(3):223-8, 243-4 - PubMed
  19. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;11(6):391-400 - PubMed

Publication Types