Display options
Cite
Cannon K, Hartsell Z, Ivanov I, et al. Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):338-40doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1.
Cannon, K., Hartsell, Z., Ivanov, I., Charles, J., Joshi, H., Blair, J., & Geyer, H. (2014). Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process. Journal of graduate medical education, 6(2), 338-40. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1
Cannon, Keith, et al. "Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process." Journal of graduate medical education vol. 6,2 (2014): 338-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1
Cannon K, Hartsell Z, Ivanov I, Charles J, Joshi H, Blair J, Geyer H. Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):338-40. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1. PMID: 24949144; PMCID: PMC4054739.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):338-40. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1.

Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process.

Journal of graduate medical education

Keith Cannon, Zachary Hartsell, Ilko Ivanov, Joseph Charles, Harshad Joshi, Janis Blair, Holly Geyer

PMID: 24949144 PMCID: PMC4054739 DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recruitment of skilled candidates into internal medicine residency programs has relied on traditional interviewing techniques with varying degrees of success. The development of simulated medical technology has provided a new arena in which to assess candidates' clinical skills, knowledge base, situational awareness, and problem-solving dexterities within a standardized environment for educational and assessment purposes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the interest of program candidates in incorporating simulation medicine into the internal medicine residency interview process.

METHODS: As a prospective, survey-based analysis, potential candidates who completed an interview between October 2012 and January 2013 with an accredited internal medicine residency program were sent a postmatch survey that incorporated 3 additional questions relating to their prior experience with medical simulation and their views on incorporating the technology into the interview format.

RESULTS: Of the 88 candidates who completed an interview, 92% (n  =  81) were scheduled to graduate medical school in 2013 and were graduates of a US medical school. All survey responders described previous experience with medical simulation. Fifty-eight percent (n  =  51) of responders described being "less likely" to interview with or join a residency program if they were required to participate in a 10-minute medical simulation during the interview process.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that despite the increasing role of technology in medical education, its role in high-stakes evaluations (such as residency interviews) requires further maturation before general acceptance by residency candidates can be expected.

References

  1. Med Educ. 2009 Oct;43(10):993-1000 - PubMed
  2. Mil Med. 2009 Dec;174(12):1282-6 - PubMed
  3. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):603-9 - PubMed

Publication Types