J Reprod Infertil. 2014 Apr;15(2):94-104.
Sociodemographic factors associated with pap test adherence and cervical dysplasia in surgically sterilized women.
Journal of reproduction & infertility
Katherine C Whitehouse, Jane R Montealegre, Michele Follen, Michael E Scheurer, Kjersti Aagaard
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Division, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA ; Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; Center for Women's Health Research Drexel University, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA ; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Division, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
PMID: 24918082
PMCID: PMC4032975
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine dysplasia screening decreases the rates of cervical cancer. Since many women seek gynecological care to secure contraception, it was hypothesized that sterilized women will be less likely to undergo routine cervical cancer screening. Prior studies tried to evaluate this relationship, but results were conflicting. The study sought to further explore the sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors that might predispose sterilized women to be screening non-adherent and more likely to have cervical dysplasia.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of women (n=1688) enrolled in a cross-sectional study in North America and divided into screening (n=925) and diagnostic (n=763) groups was performed. Information about sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors, surgical sterilization and date of last Pap test were obtained from questionnaires. Cervical histology was obtained from pathology records. Univariable analyses identified differences in risk factors between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate Pap adherence and cervical dysplasia.
RESULTS: Sterilized women were 39% more likely to be screening non-adherent (p≤0.05) especially if divorced, separated or widowed (OR=1.62), Hispanic (OR=1.57) and with a higher number of vaginal births (OR=2.00). Education was an effect measure modifier, significantly associated with non-adherence (OR=1.60). The association between sterilization and non-adherence remained significant when adjusted for confounders (AOR=1.47). Sterilization was associated with an 80% increased odds of cervical dysplasia in women over 40.
CONCLUSION: Sterilized women with certain sociodemographic factors are more likely to be non-adherent with Pap screening and more prone to dysplasia. These findings may assist practitioners in counseling at-risk patients.
Keywords: Cervical dysplasia screening; Pap test cervical dysplasia; Sterilization; Tubal ligation
References
- CMAJ. 2013 Jan 8;185(1):35-45 - PubMed
- J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Jul;15(3):195-9 - PubMed
- Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 May;49(2):210-1 - PubMed
- Am J Prev Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;2(4):220-5 - PubMed
- J Womens Health. 1999 Jan-Feb;8(1):103-7 - PubMed
- Am J Nurs. 2003 Nov;103(11):101-2, 105-6, 108-9 - PubMed
- CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Mar-Apr;63(2):88-105 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1609-21 - PubMed
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Nov;18(11):1759-68 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):340-5 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):596-602 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2003 Jun 28;361(9376):2217-25 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 14;170(11):977-85 - PubMed
- Gend Med. 2012 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S36-47 - PubMed
- Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Oct-Dec;10(4):645-50 - PubMed
- Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):278-82 - PubMed
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):447.e1-8 - PubMed
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Aug;14(8):1948-52 - PubMed
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Oct;18(10):1577-83 - PubMed
- J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Apr;9(3):303-10 - PubMed
- Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-1420 - PubMed
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):835-42 - PubMed
- J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Jan;15(1):25-32 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):243-50 - PubMed
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Mar;12(3):242s-247s - PubMed
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jul;20(7):1091-6 - PubMed
- Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2 Suppl):S5-10 - PubMed
- Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Dec;99(3 Suppl 1):S236-44 - PubMed
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Oct;15(8):941-51 - PubMed
- J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011 Apr;15(2):114-9 - PubMed
Publication Types
Grant support