Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 11;5:291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00291. eCollection 2014.

Sharing and giving across adolescence: an experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior.

Frontiers in psychology

Berna Güroğlu, Wouter van den Bos, Eveline A Crone

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
  2. Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Development Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 24782796 PMCID: PMC3990099 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00291

Abstract

In this study we use economic exchange games to examine the development of prosocial behavior in the form of sharing and giving in social interactions with peers across adolescence. Participants from four age groups (9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-year-olds, total N = 119) played three types of distribution games and the Trust game with four different interaction partners: friends, antagonists, neutral classmates, and anonymous peers. Nine- and 12-year-olds showed similar levels of prosocial behavior to all interaction partners, whereas older adolescents showed increasing differentiation in prosocial behavior depending on the relation with peers, with most prosocial behavior toward friends. The age related increase in non-costly prosocial behavior toward friends was mediated by self-reported perspective-taking skills. Current findings extend existing evidence on the developmental patterns of fairness considerations from childhood into late adolescence. Together, we show that adolescents are increasingly better at incorporating social context into decision-making. Our findings further highlight the role of friendships as a significant social context for the development of prosocial behavior in early adolescence.

Keywords: adolescence; fairness; friendship; peer relationships; prosocial behavior; reciprocity; trust

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 19;3:424 - PubMed
  2. Child Dev. 2008 Nov-Dec;79(6):1659-75 - PubMed
  3. Child Dev. 1996 Feb;67(1):1-13 - PubMed
  4. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):398-409 - PubMed
  5. Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):634-41 - PubMed
  6. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9(7):1030-7 - PubMed
  7. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23-48 - PubMed
  8. Child Dev. 1995 Aug;66(4):1179-97 - PubMed
  9. Cognition. 2011 Aug;120(2):215-24 - PubMed
  10. Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):1-25 - PubMed
  11. Neuron. 2012 Mar 8;73(5):1040-51 - PubMed
  12. J Pers. 2013 Jun;81(3):302-12 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):404-31 - PubMed
  14. Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):267-73 - PubMed
  15. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):198-209 - PubMed
  16. Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):889-900 - PubMed
  17. Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):944-8 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1079-83 - PubMed
  19. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48292 - PubMed
  20. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):186-98 - PubMed
  21. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):60-70 - PubMed
  23. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1611-8 - PubMed
  24. Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):562-76 - PubMed
  25. Dev Psychol. 2013 Dec;49(12):2236-44 - PubMed
  26. Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):331-8 - PubMed
  27. Child Dev. 1999 Nov-Dec;70(6):1360-72 - PubMed
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):268-80 - PubMed
  29. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(2):179-96 - PubMed
  30. Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):222-31 - PubMed
  31. Psychol Bull. 1987 Jan;101(1):91-119 - PubMed
  32. Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):974-92 - PubMed
  33. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59510 - PubMed
  34. Dev Psychol. 1984 Sep;20(5):925-931 - PubMed
  35. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31491 - PubMed
  36. Multivariate Behav Res. 1981 Jan 1;16(1):105-23 - PubMed
  37. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 15;39(2):903-10 - PubMed
  38. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):382-95 - PubMed
  39. Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):793-811 - PubMed

Publication Types