Display options
Share it on

Urol Ann. 2014 Apr;6(2):130-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.130555.

Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience.

Urology annals

Prem Nath Dogra, Ashish Kumar Saini, Prabhjot Singh, Girdhar Bora, Brusabhanu Nayak

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

PMID: 24833824 PMCID: PMC4021652 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.130555

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience and technique of performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the extraperitoneal approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, between September 2010 to January 2012, were included in the study. All patients underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients were placed supine with only 10-15(0) Trendelenburg tilt. The extraperitoneal space was developed behind the posterior rectus sheath. A five-port technique was used. After incision of endopelvic fascia and ligation of the deep venous complex, the rest of the procedure proceeded along the lines of the transperitoneal approach.

RESULTS: The mean patient age, prostate size and Gleason score were 67 ± 1.8 years, 45 ± 9.55 g and 6, respectively. The mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.50 ng/mL. The mean time required for creating extraperitoneal space, docking of robot and console time were 22, 7 and 94 min, respectively. The mean time to resume full oral feeds was 22 ± 3.45 h. There were no conversions from extraperitoneal to transperitoneal or open surgery in our series. Pathological stage was pT1, pT2a and pT3b in 11 (40.74%), 14 (51.85%) and two (7.4%) patients, respectively. Two patients had positive surgical margins and two had biochemical recurrence at the last follow-up. Our mean follow-up was 12 ± 3.30 (2-17) months. The overall continence rate was 83.33% and 92.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal RALP is an efficacious, minimally invasive approach for patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate.

Keywords: Carcinoma prostate; extraperitoneal; prostatectomy; robotics

References

  1. J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):416-9 - PubMed
  2. BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):408-10 - PubMed
  3. J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):714-6 - PubMed
  4. J Endourol. 2004 Sep;18(7):611-9; discussion 619 - PubMed
  5. Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9 - PubMed
  6. Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):101-4 - PubMed
  7. J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):577-82 - PubMed
  8. Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):1077-81 - PubMed
  9. Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4):569-72 - PubMed
  10. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2008 Mar;60(1):31-9 - PubMed
  11. J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1467-72 - PubMed
  12. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(3):197-210 - PubMed
  13. Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):83-94 - PubMed
  14. Surg Endosc. 1998 Oct;12(10):1264-7 - PubMed
  15. J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):269-72 - PubMed
  16. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):945-50; discussion 951 - PubMed
  17. J Endourol. 2001 May;15(4):441-5; discussion 447-8 - PubMed
  18. BJU Int. 2010 Apr;105(8):1155-60 - PubMed
  19. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):849-53 - PubMed
  20. Urology. 2003 Mar;61(3):617-22 - PubMed

Publication Types