Display options
Share it on

Brain Sci. 2012 Oct 17;2(4):504-22. doi: 10.3390/brainsci2040504.

Subliminal affect valence words change conscious mood potency but not valence: is this evidence for unconscious valence affect?.

Brain sciences

Howard Shevrin, Jaak Panksepp, Linda A W Brakel, Michael Snodgrass

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State University, PO Box 646520, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. [email protected].
  3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. [email protected].
  4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 24961258 PMCID: PMC4061819 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci2040504

Abstract

Whether or not affect can be unconscious remains controversial. Research claiming to demonstrate unconscious affect fails to establish clearly unconscious stimulus conditions. The few investigations that have established unconscious conditions fail to rule out conscious affect changes. We report two studies in which unconscious stimulus conditions were met and conscious mood changes measured. The subliminal stimuli were positive and negative affect words presented at the objective detection threshold; conscious mood changes were measured with standard manikin valence, potency, and arousal scales. We found and replicated that unconscious emotional stimuli produced conscious mood changes on the potency scale but not on the valence scale. Were positive and negative affects aroused unconsciously, but reflected consciously in potency changes? Or were the valence words unconscious cognitive causes of conscious mood changes being activated without unconscious affect? A thought experiment is offered as a way to resolve this dilemma.

References

  1. Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Feb;148:133-43 - PubMed
  2. Nurs Res. 1989 Sep-Oct;38(5):286-8 - PubMed
  3. Science. 1968 Jul 19;161(3838):295-8 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Rev. 2002 Apr;109(2):219-59 - PubMed
  5. Percept Psychophys. 2004 Jul;66(5):846-67 - PubMed
  6. Psychol Rev. 1974 Jan;81(1):1-25 - PubMed
  7. Neuron. 2007 Jun 7;54(5):677-96 - PubMed
  8. Psychol Rev. 2003 Apr;110(2):376-88; discussion 389-96 - PubMed
  9. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 - PubMed
  10. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 May;51(5):737-43 - PubMed
  11. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Oct;3(10):1049-56 - PubMed
  12. Am J Psychol. 2002 Winter;115(4):545-79 - PubMed
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 May;64(5):723-39 - PubMed
  14. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):30-80 - PubMed
  15. Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):557-8 - PubMed
  16. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;31(1):121-35 - PubMed
  17. Cogn Emot. 2003 Mar;17(2):181-211 - PubMed
  18. Cognition. 2006 Aug;101(1):43-79 - PubMed
  19. Psychol Issues. 1973;8(2):56-87 - PubMed
  20. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001 Aug;42(1):11-34 - PubMed
  21. Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):115-34 - PubMed
  22. Psychophysiology. 1994 Jan;31(1):87-101 - PubMed
  23. Science. 1996 Sep 20;273(5282):1699-702 - PubMed
  24. Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;131(2):224-30; author reply 237-40 - PubMed
  25. J Psychiatr Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;33(4):341-7 - PubMed
  26. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jan;112(1):159-71 - PubMed

Publication Types