Physiol Rep. 2014 Jun 24;2(6). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12030.
Obesity decreases both whole muscle and fascicle strength in young females but only exacerbates the aging-related whole muscle level asthenia.
Physiological reports
David J Tomlinson, Robert M Erskine, Keith Winwood, Christopher Ian Morse, Gladys L Onambélé
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Institute for Performance Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe Green Road, Crewe, CW1 5DU, U.K.
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Institute for Performance Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe Green Road, Crewe, CW1 5DU, U.K Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, U.K.
PMID: 24963030
PMCID: PMC4208641 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12030
Abstract
Obesity has previously been associated with greater muscle strength. Aging, on the other hand, reduces muscle specific force (the force per unit physiological cross-sectional area [PCSA] of muscle). However, neither the effect of obesity on skeletal muscle specific force nor the combined effects of aging and obesity on this parameter are known. This study aimed to describe the interplay between body mass index (BMI)/adiposity, aging, and skeletal muscle specific force. Ninety-four untrained healthy women categorized by age into young (Y; mean ± SD: 25.5 ± 9.0 years) versus old (O; 64.8 ± 7.2 years) were assessed for body composition, gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscle volume (V), net maximum voluntary contraction (nMVC), and specific force (SF). The young obese, while demonstrating 71% and 29% (P < 0.001) higher V and nMVC compared to normal BMI individuals, were in fact 26% (P = 0.007) weaker than these, where V was used to scale nMVC (i.e., nMVC/V). The weakness associated with obesity was further exemplified in the 34% (P < 0.001) lower SF relative to normal BMI individuals. Similarly, ≥40% body fat was associated with 60% and 27% (P < 0.001) higher V and nMVC, but 11% and 25% (P < 0.01) lower nMVC/V and SF than <40% body fat. The aging-related rates of decline in V (-2 cm(3)/year P < 0.05) and nMVC (-1.2 cm(3)/year P < 0.05) were highest in obesity defined by BMI. This effect was also seen when segregating by >40% adiposity. Interestingly, however, obesity appeared advantageous to the aging-related changes in nMVC/V (P < 0.001) and SF (P < 0.001). Unlike previous reports of greater strength in the obese compared with leaner age-matched counterparts, we in fact demonstrate that the young sedentary obese, are substantially weaker, where the volume of skeletal muscle is used to scale the maximal torque output, or forces are quantified at the fascicular level. The seemingly positive impact of obesity on rate of aging, however, is complex and warrants further investigations.
© 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society.
Keywords: Aging; obesity; specific force
References
- Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1336-44 - PubMed
- Age (Dordr). 2014 Jun;36(3):9652 - PubMed
- Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997 Sep;21(9):796-801 - PubMed
- J Orthop Res. 1992 Nov;10(6):928-34 - PubMed
- Exp Physiol. 1998 Nov;83(6):843-55 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1050-5 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Sep;101(1):51-9 - PubMed
- Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Dec;32 Suppl 7:S120-6 - PubMed
- Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Feb;20(1):28-38 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jul;103(4):481-4 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Aug;106(6):827-38 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Nov;83(4 -5):363-9 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Jan;80(1):158-65 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8 - PubMed
- Endocrinology. 2003 May;144(5):1770-9 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Mar;102(3):919-25 - PubMed
- J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):242-8 - PubMed
- Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Aug;32 Suppl 3:S56-9 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Nov;83(5):1581-7 - PubMed
- J Clin Invest. 1995 May;95(5):2409-15 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Mar;90(3):865-72 - PubMed
- Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Jan;34(1):47-55 - PubMed
- Clin Physiol. 1989 Jun;9(3):207-20 - PubMed
- Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Feb;28(2):234-41 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Aug;18(4):415-9 - PubMed
- J Biomech. 2000 Feb;33(2):215-8 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):985-96 - PubMed
- Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jun;89(6):1895-900 - PubMed
- Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2010 May;199(1):83-9 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005 Jul;69(1):29-35 - PubMed
- Obes Surg. 2012 Aug;22(8):1276-80 - PubMed
- Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1579-85 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jun;92(1-2):219-26 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(5):563-70 - PubMed
- J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:11-6 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61(3-4):313-8 - PubMed
- J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;32(7):347-56 - PubMed
- Obes Res. 2004 Dec;12(12):1995-2004 - PubMed
- Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 May;25(5):676-81 - PubMed
- Biogerontology. 2013 Jun;14(3):261-72 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Mar;96(3):885-92 - PubMed
- Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 - PubMed
- Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jun;33(6):792-800 - PubMed
- J Anat. 1991 Feb;174:239-49 - PubMed
- Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Jul;29(7):833-41 - PubMed
- J Aging Phys Act. 2007 Jul;15(3):287-99 - PubMed
- Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):564-9 - PubMed
- Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Apr;37(2):269-75 - PubMed
- Diabetes. 1996 Apr;45(4):440-5 - PubMed
- Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):552-7 - PubMed
Publication Types