Display options
Share it on

Physiol Rep. 2014 Jun 24;2(6). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12030.

Obesity decreases both whole muscle and fascicle strength in young females but only exacerbates the aging-related whole muscle level asthenia.

Physiological reports

David J Tomlinson, Robert M Erskine, Keith Winwood, Christopher Ian Morse, Gladys L Onambélé

Affiliations

  1. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Institute for Performance Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe Green Road, Crewe, CW1 5DU, U.K.
  2. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Institute for Performance Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe Green Road, Crewe, CW1 5DU, U.K Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, U.K.

PMID: 24963030 PMCID: PMC4208641 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12030

Abstract

Obesity has previously been associated with greater muscle strength. Aging, on the other hand, reduces muscle specific force (the force per unit physiological cross-sectional area [PCSA] of muscle). However, neither the effect of obesity on skeletal muscle specific force nor the combined effects of aging and obesity on this parameter are known. This study aimed to describe the interplay between body mass index (BMI)/adiposity, aging, and skeletal muscle specific force. Ninety-four untrained healthy women categorized by age into young (Y; mean ± SD: 25.5 ± 9.0 years) versus old (O; 64.8 ± 7.2 years) were assessed for body composition, gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscle volume (V), net maximum voluntary contraction (nMVC), and specific force (SF). The young obese, while demonstrating 71% and 29% (P < 0.001) higher V and nMVC compared to normal BMI individuals, were in fact 26% (P = 0.007) weaker than these, where V was used to scale nMVC (i.e., nMVC/V). The weakness associated with obesity was further exemplified in the 34% (P < 0.001) lower SF relative to normal BMI individuals. Similarly, ≥40% body fat was associated with 60% and 27% (P < 0.001) higher V and nMVC, but 11% and 25% (P < 0.01) lower nMVC/V and SF than <40% body fat. The aging-related rates of decline in V (-2 cm(3)/year P < 0.05) and nMVC (-1.2 cm(3)/year P < 0.05) were highest in obesity defined by BMI. This effect was also seen when segregating by >40% adiposity. Interestingly, however, obesity appeared advantageous to the aging-related changes in nMVC/V (P < 0.001) and SF (P < 0.001). Unlike previous reports of greater strength in the obese compared with leaner age-matched counterparts, we in fact demonstrate that the young sedentary obese, are substantially weaker, where the volume of skeletal muscle is used to scale the maximal torque output, or forces are quantified at the fascicular level. The seemingly positive impact of obesity on rate of aging, however, is complex and warrants further investigations.

© 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society.

Keywords: Aging; obesity; specific force

References

  1. Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1336-44 - PubMed
  2. Age (Dordr). 2014 Jun;36(3):9652 - PubMed
  3. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997 Sep;21(9):796-801 - PubMed
  4. J Orthop Res. 1992 Nov;10(6):928-34 - PubMed
  5. Exp Physiol. 1998 Nov;83(6):843-55 - PubMed
  6. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1050-5 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Sep;101(1):51-9 - PubMed
  8. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Dec;32 Suppl 7:S120-6 - PubMed
  9. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Feb;20(1):28-38 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jul;103(4):481-4 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Aug;106(6):827-38 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Nov;83(4 -5):363-9 - PubMed
  13. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Jan;80(1):158-65 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8 - PubMed
  15. Endocrinology. 2003 May;144(5):1770-9 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Mar;102(3):919-25 - PubMed
  17. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):242-8 - PubMed
  18. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Aug;32 Suppl 3:S56-9 - PubMed
  19. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Nov;83(5):1581-7 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Invest. 1995 May;95(5):2409-15 - PubMed
  21. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Mar;90(3):865-72 - PubMed
  22. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Jan;34(1):47-55 - PubMed
  23. Clin Physiol. 1989 Jun;9(3):207-20 - PubMed
  24. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Feb;28(2):234-41 - PubMed
  25. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Aug;18(4):415-9 - PubMed
  26. J Biomech. 2000 Feb;33(2):215-8 - PubMed
  27. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):985-96 - PubMed
  28. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jun;89(6):1895-900 - PubMed
  29. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2010 May;199(1):83-9 - PubMed
  30. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005 Jul;69(1):29-35 - PubMed
  31. Obes Surg. 2012 Aug;22(8):1276-80 - PubMed
  32. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1579-85 - PubMed
  33. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jun;92(1-2):219-26 - PubMed
  34. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jul;100(5):563-70 - PubMed
  35. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:11-6 - PubMed
  36. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61(3-4):313-8 - PubMed
  37. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;32(7):347-56 - PubMed
  38. Obes Res. 2004 Dec;12(12):1995-2004 - PubMed
  39. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 May;25(5):676-81 - PubMed
  40. Biogerontology. 2013 Jun;14(3):261-72 - PubMed
  41. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Mar;96(3):885-92 - PubMed
  42. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 - PubMed
  43. Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jun;33(6):792-800 - PubMed
  44. J Anat. 1991 Feb;174:239-49 - PubMed
  45. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Jul;29(7):833-41 - PubMed
  46. J Aging Phys Act. 2007 Jul;15(3):287-99 - PubMed
  47. Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):564-9 - PubMed
  48. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Apr;37(2):269-75 - PubMed
  49. Diabetes. 1996 Apr;45(4):440-5 - PubMed
  50. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):552-7 - PubMed

Publication Types