Display options
Share it on

Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;8(2):249-55. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.130739.

Use of modified rapid sequence tracheal intubation in pediatric patients.

Saudi journal of anaesthesia

Claude Abdallah, Raafat Hannallah

Affiliations

  1. Division of Anesthesiology, Children's National Medical Center, NW, Washington D.C. 20010 - 2970, USA.

PMID: 24843342 PMCID: PMC4024686 DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.130739

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) has been an established practice, but is not without risks to patient. In different situations, a modification of the standard RSI technique may be more appropriate. The definition of a modified rapid sequence intubation (MRSI) is not well-documented. The purpose of this survey was to determine the working definition of MRSI as well as the modality of its use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive study consisted of a survey of pediatric anesthesiologists and included basic questions related to the anesthesiologist's experience, practice setting and use of MRSI. Responses were compiled and analyzed to identify the working definition, technique, perceived indications/complications as well as hands-on performance of tracheal intubation during use of MRSI in children.

RESULTS: The mean ± SD years in practice of the 228 respondents were 14.9 ± 8.16 years, with pediatric patients comprising 77 ± 33% of their practice. 76.8% completed a fellowship in pediatric anesthesia. 60% of the respondents' practice setting was at a Children's Hospital. Different respondents agreed with different techniques of MRSI with the majority (65%) defining a MRSI as equivalent to a RSI, but with mask ventilation. The major indication of use of a MRSI was a concern about apnea time tolerance with traditional RSI (74%).

CONCLUSION: Technique of a MRSI varies among pediatric care providers.

Keywords: Airway; endotracheal; intubation; pediatrics; survey; technique

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Oct;73(4):559-63 - PubMed
  2. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):7-9 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Mar;14(2):115-20 - PubMed
  4. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Sep;12(7):655; author reply 655 - PubMed
  5. Br J Anaesth. 1987 Mar;59(3):315-8 - PubMed
  6. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):60-4 - PubMed
  7. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Oct;97(4):564-70 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Nov;8(7):568-74 - PubMed
  9. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;57(4):330-6 - PubMed
  10. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Aug;31(4):388-91 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 1979 Aug 4;2(8136):228-30 - PubMed
  12. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Apr-Jun;10(2):101-5 - PubMed
  13. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1363-6 - PubMed
  14. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Feb;12(2):140-5 - PubMed
  15. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Jan;12(1):1-4 - PubMed
  16. Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):263-8 - PubMed
  17. Masui. 2007 May;56(5):534-41 - PubMed
  18. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Oct;53(9):1167-72 - PubMed
  19. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2003 Feb;50(2):87-96 - PubMed
  20. Anesth Analg. 1984 Jan;63(1):60-4 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 1961 Aug 19;2(7199):404-6 - PubMed
  22. Paediatr Anaesth. 1995;5(2):115-9 - PubMed
  23. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Nov;45(10):1210-4 - PubMed
  24. Anesth Analg. 1998 Dec;87(6):1259-62 - PubMed
  25. Anaesthesia. 1999 Mar;54(3):247-52 - PubMed
  26. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Feb;18(2):97-9 - PubMed
  27. Anesth Analg. 1998 May;86(5):945-51 - PubMed

Publication Types