Display options
Share it on

J Tradit Complement Med. 2014 Jan;4(1):64-71. doi: 10.4103/2225-4110.124351.

Protective Effects of N-acetylcysteine and a Prostaglandin E1 Analog, Alprostadil, Against Hepatic Ischemia: Reperfusion Injury in Rats.

Journal of traditional and complementary medicine

Cheng-Chu Hsieh, Shu-Chen Hsieh, Jen-Hwey Chiu, Ying-Ling Wu

Affiliations

  1. Department and Institute of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. ; Biologics Division, Animal Health Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, New Taipei, Taiwan.
  2. Graduate Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  3. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. ; Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  4. Department and Institute of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

PMID: 24872935 PMCID: PMC4032844 DOI: 10.4103/2225-4110.124351

Abstract

Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury has a complex pathophysiology resulting from a number of contributing factors. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve effective treatment or protection by individually targeting the mediators or mechanisms. Our aim was to analyze the individual and combined effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analog alprostadil on hepatic I/R injury in rats. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups (six rats per group) as follows: Control group, I/R group, I/R + NAC group, I/R + alprostadil group, and I/R + NAC + alprostadil group. The rats received injections of NAC (150 mg/kg) and/or alprostadil (0.05 μg/kg) over a period of 30 min prior to ischemia. These rats were then subjected to 60 min of hepatic ischemia followed by a 60-min reperfusion period. Hepatic superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione levels were significantly decreased as a result of I/R injury, but they were increased in groups treated with NAC. Hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and nitric oxide (NO) activities were significantly increased after I/R injury, but they were decreased in the groups with NAC treatment. Alprostadil decreased NO production, but had no effect on MDA and MPO. Histological results showed that both NAC and alprostadil were effective in improving liver tissue morphology during I/R injury. Although NAC and alprostadil did not have a synergistic effect, our findings suggest that treatment with either NAC or alprostadil has benefits for ameliorating hepatic I/R injury.

Keywords: Alprostadil; Ischemia–reperfusion; N-acetylcysteine; Prostaglandin E1 analog

References

  1. Am J Pathol. 1994 Dec;145(6):1421-31 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Clin Invest. 1998 May;28(5):389-97 - PubMed
  3. FASEB J. 2001 May;15(7):1230-2 - PubMed
  4. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Sep;187(3):276-86 - PubMed
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;939:200-15 - PubMed
  6. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Aug 24;426(1-2):1-10 - PubMed
  7. Toxicon. 2003 Mar 1;41(3):333-8 - PubMed
  8. Thromb Haemost. 1983 Dec 30;50(4):869-72 - PubMed
  9. Am J Physiol. 1993 Apr;264(4 Pt 1):G801-9 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Surg. 1998 Feb;164(2):139-46 - PubMed
  11. Transplant Proc. 1989 Apr;21(2):3360-1 - PubMed
  12. Liver Transpl. 2004 Apr;10(4):520-8 - PubMed
  13. Hepatology. 1993 May;17(5):915-23 - PubMed
  14. Surgery. 1986 Feb;99(2):211-5 - PubMed
  15. Methods Enzymol. 1978;52:302-10 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Invest. 2003 Jan;111(2):163-9 - PubMed
  17. J Immunol. 1982 Jul;129(1):309-13 - PubMed
  18. J Hepatol. 1988 Feb;6(1):125-31 - PubMed
  19. Circ Shock. 1992 Mar;36(3):163-8 - PubMed
  20. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2003 Apr;22(4):205-11 - PubMed
  21. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1993 Dec;9(6):610-6 - PubMed
  22. Am J Physiol. 1980 Feb;238(2):H176-81 - PubMed
  23. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Aug;14(8):2199-210 - PubMed
  24. Hepatology. 1992 Mar;15(3):507-14 - PubMed
  25. Ann Surg. 1983 Jul;198(1):87-90 - PubMed
  26. Clin Sci (Lond). 1991 Jul;81(1):31-6 - PubMed
  27. Drug Metab Rev. 2005;37(2):311-25 - PubMed
  28. Gastroenterology. 1984 Apr;86(4):627-31 - PubMed
  29. Cardiovasc Res. 2000 Aug 18;47(3):537-48 - PubMed
  30. Hepatology. 2004 Jul;40(1):211-20 - PubMed
  31. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 17;312(3):159-63 - PubMed
  32. J Pharmacol Methods. 1990 Dec;24(4):285-95 - PubMed
  33. Am J Physiol. 1990 Feb;258(2 Pt 1):G185-90 - PubMed
  34. Free Radic Biol Med. 1989;6(6):593-7 - PubMed
  35. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1993;17F:270-7 - PubMed
  36. Microvasc Res. 2002 Jul;64(1):94-103 - PubMed
  37. Transplant Proc. 1998 Nov;30(7):3700-2 - PubMed
  38. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(56):526-31 - PubMed
  39. Hepatology. 1988 Mar-Apr;8(2):254-8 - PubMed
  40. FASEB J. 1990 Dec;4(15):3355-9 - PubMed
  41. Life Sci. 1997;61(19):1961-71 - PubMed
  42. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Aug;86(2):262-72 - PubMed
  43. Eur J Biochem. 1990 Sep 11;192(2):245-61 - PubMed
  44. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991 Feb;20(2):123-34 - PubMed
  45. J Orthop Res. 2008 Dec;26(12):1670-4 - PubMed
  46. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Aug;34(2):384-99 - PubMed
  47. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2001;24(1):49-57 - PubMed
  48. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;125(3):678-85 - PubMed
  49. Respiration. 1986;50 Suppl 1:31-42 - PubMed
  50. Transplantation. 1991 Dec;52(6):979-83 - PubMed
  51. J Surg Res. 2001 Aug;99(2):328-34 - PubMed
  52. Lancet. 1992 Apr 11;339(8798):909-12 - PubMed
  53. World J Surg. 2004 Jun;28(6):620-4 - PubMed
  54. Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Jan;47(1):152-6 - PubMed

Publication Types