Display options
Cite
Korkmaz FM, Baygin O, Tuzuner T, et al. The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:S033-S040doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119061.
Korkmaz, F. M., Baygin, O., Tuzuner, T., Bagis, B., & Arslan, I. (2013). The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. European journal of dentistry, 7S033-S040. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119061
Korkmaz, Fatih Mehmet, et al. "The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations." European journal of dentistry vol. 7 (2013): S033-S040. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119061
Korkmaz FM, Baygin O, Tuzuner T, Bagis B, Arslan I. The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7:S033-S040. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119061. PMID: 24966726; PMCID: PMC4054077.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7:S033-S040. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119061.

The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations.

European journal of dentistry

Fatih Mehmet Korkmaz, Ozgul Baygin, Tamer Tuzuner, Bora Bagis, Ipek Arslan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye.
  2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye.
  3. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkiye.

PMID: 24966726 PMCID: PMC4054077 DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.119061

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microleakage and bond strength of Class V silorane-based and universal micro-hybrid composite restorations prepared either with diamond bur or with an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 160 molar teeth were used for microleakage assessment and shear bond strength (SBS) test. The specimens were prepared using either diamond bur or 3 W-, 4 W- and 5 W-20 Hz Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (500 times at 5 ± 2°C to 55 ± 2°C, dwell time 15 s and transfer time 10 s). Microleakage was assessed using a 0.5% basic-fuchsin solution. The bond strengths were determined using a microtensile tester at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The Kruskal Wallis test was used for the analysis of microleakage and a one-way analysis of variance test was used to analyze the SBS (P < 0.05).

RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found (P > 0.05) between Er, Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation methods regarding microleakage and bond strength values.

CONCLUSION: Irradiation with Er, Cr:YSGG laser was confirmed to be as effective as conventional methods for preparing cavities before adhesive restorations.

Keywords: Diamond bur; chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser; erbium; micro-hybrid composite; silorane

References

  1. Dent Mater. 1999 Jul;15(4):229-37 - PubMed
  2. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jul;25(4):493-502 - PubMed
  3. Oper Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;26(5):491-7 - PubMed
  4. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):785-94 - PubMed
  5. Gen Dent. 2011 May-Jun;59(3):e96-100 - PubMed
  6. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jan;6(1):56-62 - PubMed
  7. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 May;26(3):293-7 - PubMed
  8. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Nov;25(6):881-9 - PubMed
  9. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):761-5 - PubMed
  10. Lasers Med Sci. 2003;18(1):25-31 - PubMed
  11. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Jan;26(1):13-9 - PubMed
  12. Dent Mater J. 2002 Sep;21(3):238-49 - PubMed
  13. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Oct;30(10):1008-14 - PubMed
  14. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001 Jan;11(1):49-56 - PubMed
  15. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1998 Dec;16(6):305-8 - PubMed
  16. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Dec;122(6):649-56 - PubMed
  17. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17(4):155-9 - PubMed
  18. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):835-41 - PubMed
  19. Am J Dent. 2004 Oct;17(5):331-6 - PubMed
  20. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Apr;28(2):267-72 - PubMed
  21. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(4):371-4 - PubMed
  22. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):340-6 - PubMed
  23. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Jul;38(6):615-23 - PubMed
  24. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):152-5 - PubMed
  25. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):783-9 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002 Spring;26(3):263-8 - PubMed
  27. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 May;25(3):363-9 - PubMed
  28. Oper Dent. 1992;Suppl 5:125-30 - PubMed
  29. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jan;6(1):16-23 - PubMed
  30. Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):578-85 - PubMed
  31. Dent Mater J. 2009 May;28(3):362-7 - PubMed
  32. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 May;25(3):325-9 - PubMed
  33. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(3):254-9 - PubMed
  34. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Dec;24(6):715-22 - PubMed
  35. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):153-60 - PubMed
  36. J Esthet Dent. 1998;10(6):296-304 - PubMed
  37. Am J Dent. 1998 Oct;11(5):219-24 - PubMed
  38. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Nov;29(11):747-52 - PubMed
  39. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Oct;82(4):451-5 - PubMed
  40. Dent Mater. 2005 Jan;21(1):68-74 - PubMed
  41. Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):172-5 - PubMed
  42. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):359-66 - PubMed
  43. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jan;27(1):23-9 - PubMed

Publication Types