Display options
Share it on

Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 May;147(3):171-8. doi: 10.1177/1715163514529706.

Helping pharmacists to reduce fall risk in long-term care: A clinical tool to facilitate the medication review process.

Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC

Carlos H Rojas-Fernandez, Nicole Seymour, Susan G Brown

Affiliations

  1. Schlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging (Rojas-Fernandez, Brown), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.

PMID: 24847370 PMCID: PMC4025879 DOI: 10.1177/1715163514529706

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One-third to one-half of adults older than 65 fall at least once per year. Fall prevention through medication management requires little effort and has consistently been shown to reduce risk of falls. The objective of this study was to further develop and perform preliminary pilot testing of an algorithm designed to assist consultant pharmacists in systematically identifying medications that might be modifiable, in order to reduce the risk of falls in older adults. We hypothesized that algorithm use would increase the number of fall-related medication change recommendations made to physicians.

METHODS: Four consultant pharmacists were trained to use the algorithm during their routine medication reviews over a 3-week period. An informal survey was administered at the end of the study period to assess the algorithm.

RESULTS: Overall, 51% of residents of long-term facilities had 1 or more recommendations for medication changes related to reducing fall risk (range 0-3 recommendations per resident), with an average 0.675 recommendations made per resident. There were more recommendations for men compared with women and for residents receiving more medications, but the number of recommendations did not correspond with age. All 4 pharmacists agreed that the algorithm was useful and worthwhile.

DISCUSSION: The absolute 20% increase in recommendations related to falls supports the study hypothesis. Time was cited as a barrier to using the algorithm, but this should decrease with continued use of this tool.

CONCLUSION: This preliminary study furthered the development of and confirmed the possible utility and acceptability of a fall risk-reducing algorithm that may be used in practice.

References

  1. JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):258-66 - PubMed
  2. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):625-6 - PubMed
  3. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006 Jul;32(7):6-14 - PubMed
  4. Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(3):189-91; quiz 192 - PubMed
  5. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Nov;26(4):705-18 - PubMed
  6. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Jan;20(1):1-4 - PubMed
  7. Drugs Aging. 2012 May 1;29(5):359-76 - PubMed
  8. BMC Geriatr. 2011 Apr 17;11:16 - PubMed
  9. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Nov;26(4):693-704 - PubMed
  10. Med J Aust. 2007 Jul 2;187(1):23-30 - PubMed
  11. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Nov;26(4):583-605 - PubMed
  12. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;74(1):16-33 - PubMed
  13. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Feb;20(2):55-62 - PubMed
  14. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Apr;20(4):181-90 - PubMed
  15. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Oct;8(5):428-40 - PubMed
  16. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):510-7 - PubMed
  17. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 May-Jun;49(3):e70-82; quiz e83-4 - PubMed

Publication Types