Display options
Share it on

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;25(8):1197-204. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12055.

Effect of Rapid Chilling on Beef Quality and Cytoskeletal Protein Degradation in M. longissimus of Chinese Yellow Crossbred Bulls.

Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences

Yanwei Mao, Yimin Zhang, Rongrong Liang, Lulu Ren, He Zhu, Ke Li, Lixian Zhu, Xin Luo

Affiliations

  1. Yanwei Mao and Yimin Zhang contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.

PMID: 25049681 PMCID: PMC4092990 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12055

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of rapid chilling (RC) on beef quality and the degradation of cytoskeletal proteins. Twenty Chinese Yellow crossbred bulls were selected and randomly divided into two groups. RC and conventional chilling (CC) were applied to left and right sides of the carcasses respectively after slaughtering. To determine whether electrical stimulation (ES) treatment can alleviate the potential hazard of RC on meat quality, ES was applied to one group. The effects of RC and ES were determined by meat color, shear force and cytoskeletal protein degradation postmortem (PM). The results showed that RC decreased beef tenderness at 1 d and 3 d postmortem, but had no detrimental effect on meat color. Western blotting showed that RC decreased the degradation rate of desmin and troponin-T, but the effects weakened gradually as postmortem aging extended. Degradation rates of both desmin and troponin-T were accelerated by ES. The combination of RC and ES could improve beef color, accelerate degradation rate of cytoskeletal protein and improve beef tenderness.

Keywords: Beef; Chinese Yellow Crossbred Bulls; Cytoskeletal Protein Degradation; Electrical Stimulation; Rapid Chilling

References

  1. Meat Sci. 1987;21(1):67-72 - PubMed
  2. Meat Sci. 1987;19(3):187-96 - PubMed
  3. Meat Sci. 2001 Apr;57(4):403-11 - PubMed
  4. Meat Sci. 2008 Nov;80(3):948-51 - PubMed
  5. Meat Sci. 2010 Apr 22;72(1):9-17 - PubMed
  6. Meat Sci. 2005 Jul;70(3):449-59 - PubMed
  7. Meat Sci. 2006 May;73(1):151-6 - PubMed
  8. J Anim Sci. 2000 Nov;78(11):2842-8 - PubMed
  9. Meat Sci. 1994;37(1):115-31 - PubMed
  10. Meat Sci. 2006 Jun;73(2):204-8 - PubMed
  11. Meat Sci. 1990;28(1):31-50 - PubMed
  12. Meat Sci. 1996;43S1:217-27 - PubMed
  13. Meat Sci. 2004 Nov;68(3):497-505 - PubMed
  14. J Anim Sci. 2001 Dec;79(12):3062-8 - PubMed
  15. Biochimie. 1994;76(5):369-75 - PubMed
  16. J Anim Sci. 1994 May;72(5):1232-8 - PubMed
  17. J Anim Sci. 1996 Jul;74(7):1563-75 - PubMed
  18. Meat Sci. 1999 May;52(1):1-7 - PubMed
  19. Meat Sci. 2006 Jun;73(2):196-203 - PubMed
  20. Meat Sci. 1980 Aug;4(4):319-22 - PubMed
  21. J Anim Sci. 1999 Sep;77(9):2444-51 - PubMed
  22. J Anim Sci. 1996 Apr;74(4):779-85 - PubMed
  23. J Anim Sci. 1997 Feb;75(2):366-76 - PubMed
  24. Meat Sci. 2010 Sep;86(1):184-95 - PubMed
  25. Meat Sci. 1999 Nov;53(3):179-82 - PubMed
  26. Meat Sci. 2001 Sep;59(1):31-7 - PubMed
  27. Meat Sci. 2000 Aug;55(4):391-6 - PubMed

Publication Types