Display options
Share it on

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;26(10):1446-58. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13066.

Influence of Dietary Supplementation of Condensed Tannins through Leaf Meal Mixture on Intake, Nutrient Utilization and Performance of Haemonchus contortus Infected Sheep.

Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences

A K Pathak, Narayan Dutta, P S Banerjee, A K Pattanaik, K Sharma

Affiliations

  1. Centre of Advanced Faculty Training in Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122 (U.P.), India.

PMID: 25049728 PMCID: PMC4093080 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13066

Abstract

The study assessed the effect of dietary supplementation of leaf meal mixture (LMM) containing condensed tannins (CT) on feed intake, nutrient utilization and performance of sheep infected with Haemonchus contortus. Eighteen adult sheep of similar age and body weight (25.03±1.52) were included in this study and out of these, 12 sheep were infected with single dose of infective third stage larvae of H. contortus at 2,000 larvae per sheep. The experimental sheep were allocated in three different groups' i.e. negative control (NC; no infection), control (C; H. contortus infected) and treatment (T; H. contortus infected+CT at 1.5% of the DM through LMM) and the experiment was conducted for a period of 90 d. The intake of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and digestibility of DM, OM, neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were comparable among three animal groups. However, digestibility of crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in NC group as compared to both C and T groups. Nitrogen (N) retention (g/d or % of N intake) was significantly (p = 0.038) lower in C group as compared to T and NC groups. Daily intake (g/kg W(0.75)) of digestible crude protein (DCP), digestible organic matter (DOM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) did not differ significantly (p<0.05) in the three groups. Haemoglobin (Hb) and packed cell volume (PCV) were significantly (p<0.001) higher in treatment group as compared to control. The level of Hb and PCV reduced (p<0.001) after 30 days of experimental feeding. CT significantly (p<0.001) reduced serum urea in T group as compared to NC and C groups. Serum proteins differed significantly (p<0.01) among the three groups. The activity of serum enzymes AST, ALT, ALP and LDH were also statistically non significant (p<0.05) among treatments. The weight of abomasal lymph nodes (ALN) in T group was higher (p<0.05) than in C group. Treatment group had lower (p<0.05) total worms and fecal egg count compared to control group. It may be concluded that dietary supplementation of CT through LMM significantly improved the N retention, and inhibited the different developmental stages of Haemonchus contortus in experimental sheep.

Keywords: Condensed Tannins; Haemonchus contortus; Leaf Meal Mixture; Nutrient Utilization; Performance; Sheep

References

  1. Vet Parasitol. 2007 Mar 15;144(1-2):132-7 - PubMed
  2. Br J Nutr. 1988 Jan;59(1):125-39 - PubMed
  3. Vet Rec. 2002 Jan 19;150(3):65-9 - PubMed
  4. Vet Clin Pathol. 1984;13(2):7-14 - PubMed
  5. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Feb;26(2):187-94 - PubMed
  6. Clin Chem. 1977 May;23(5):908 - PubMed
  7. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2008 Apr;92(2):141-8 - PubMed
  8. Res Vet Sci. 1989 Nov;47(3):294-8 - PubMed
  9. Vet Parasitol. 2006 Jun 30;139(1-3):150-7 - PubMed
  10. Vet Parasitol. 1996 Oct 15;65(1-2):41-54 - PubMed
  11. Vet Parasitol. 2003 May 1;113(3-4):253-61 - PubMed
  12. Res Vet Sci. 2000 Jun;68(3):223-30 - PubMed
  13. Vet Res. 2003 May-Jun;34(3):331-9 - PubMed
  14. Nutr Res Rev. 1990 Jan;3(1):277-303 - PubMed
  15. Vet Parasitol. 2001 Aug 20;99(3):205-19 - PubMed
  16. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Nov;26(11):1295-303 - PubMed
  17. Int J Parasitol. 1989 Apr;19(2):199-205 - PubMed
  18. J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97 - PubMed
  19. Vet Parasitol. 1998 Jul 17;78(1):13-21 - PubMed
  20. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Nov;26(11):1151-67 - PubMed
  21. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1955 Oct;90(1):210-3 - PubMed
  22. Br J Nutr. 1994 Nov;72(5):665-77 - PubMed
  23. Vet J. 2004 Jul;168(1):28-40 - PubMed
  24. Nutr Res Rev. 1989 Jan;2(1):227-46 - PubMed
  25. J Anim Sci. 2008 Sep;86(9):2328-37 - PubMed
  26. Proc Nutr Soc. 1993 Feb;52(1):121-30 - PubMed
  27. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974 Feb;99(8):343-4 passim - PubMed
  28. Vet Parasitol. 1998 Dec 15;80(1):15-27 - PubMed
  29. Vet Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;31(2):247-58 - PubMed
  30. Arch Anim Nutr. 2007 Oct;61(5):390-405 - PubMed
  31. Clin Chim Acta. 1971 Nov;35(1):33-7 - PubMed
  32. Vet Parasitol. 2005 Feb 28;127(3-4):277-83 - PubMed
  33. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2000 Jun 30;75(1-2):109-20 - PubMed
  34. Analyst. 1972 Feb;97(151):142-5 - PubMed
  35. Res Vet Sci. 1986 Jan;40(1):65-75 - PubMed
  36. Clin Chem. 1977 Dec;23(12):2263-74 - PubMed
  37. J Anim Sci. 2008 Aug;86(8):1879-90 - PubMed
  38. Clin Chim Acta. 1971 Jan;31(1):87-96 - PubMed
  39. Int J Parasitol. 1992 Nov;22(7):955-60 - PubMed

Publication Types