Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014 Jul 03;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-10-33. eCollection 2014.
Add-on histamine receptor-3 antagonist for allergic rhinitis: a double blind randomized crossover trial using the environmental exposure unit.
Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Michelle L North, Terry J Walker, Lisa M Steacy, Barnaby G Hobsbawn, Richard J Allan, Frances Hackman, Xiaoqun Sun, Andrew G Day, Anne K Ellis
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada ; Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
- Pfizer Ltd., Sandwich, UK.
- Clinical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada ; Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada ; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Doran 1, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON K7L 2 V7, Canada.
PMID: 25024716
PMCID: PMC4094756 DOI: 10.1186/1710-1492-10-33
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral antihistamines that target the histamine receptor-1, such as fexofenadine, offer suboptimal relief of allergic rhinitis-associated nasal congestion. Combinations with oral sympathomimetics, such as pseudoephedrine, relieve congestion but produce side effects. Previous animal and human studies with histamine receptor-3 antagonists, such as PF-03654764, demonstrate promise.
METHODS: Herein we employ the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) to conduct the first randomized controlled trial of PF-03654764 in allergic rhinitis. 64 participants were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled 4-period crossover study. Participants were exposed to ragweed pollen for 6 hours post-dose in the EEU. The primary objective was to compare the effect of PF-03654764 + fexofenadine to pseudoephedrine + fexofenadine on the subjective measures of congestion and Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS). The objectives of our post-hoc analyses were to compare all treatments to placebo and determine the onset of action (OA). This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01033396).
RESULTS: PF-03654764 + fexofenadine was not superior to pseudoephedrine + fexofenadine. In post-hoc analyses, PF-03654764 + fexofenadine significantly reduced TNSS, relative to placebo, and OA was 60 minutes. Pseudoephedrine + fexofenadine significantly reduced congestion and TNSS, relative to placebo, with OA of 60 and 30 minutes, respectively. Although this study was not powered for a statistical analysis of safety, it was noted that all PF-03654764-treated groups experienced an elevated incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: PF-03654764 + fexofenadine failed to provide superior relief of allergic rhinitis-associated nasal symptoms upon exposure to ragweed pollen compared to fexofenadine + pseudoephedrine. However, in post-hoc analyses, PF-03654764 + fexofenadine improved TNSS compared to placebo. Side effects in the PF-03654764-treated groups were clinically significant compared to the controls.
Keywords: Allergic rhinitis; Decongestant; Environmental exposure unit; Fexofenadine; H1 receptor; H3 receptor; Nasal congestion; PF-03654764; Ragweed; pseudoephedrine
References
- J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Feb;129(2):409-12, 412.e1-2 - PubMed
- J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Mar;115(3 Suppl 1):S460-82 - PubMed
- Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan 27;11(1):5 - PubMed
- Drugs. 2009;69(18):2541-76 - PubMed
- Eur J Pharmacol. 2000 Jan 3;387(1):R5-7 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Dec;79(6):533-40 - PubMed
- Am J Rhinol. 1999 Sep-Oct;13(5):391-9 - PubMed
- Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;158(1):84-98 - PubMed
- Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Apr;9(4):351-8 - PubMed
- Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Sep 5;715(1-3):26-32 - PubMed
- Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:36-47 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Jan;92(1):73-9 - PubMed
- J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Nov;108(5 Suppl):S147-334 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 May;26 Suppl 3:44-51 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Aug;83(2):83-9; quiz 89-93 - PubMed
- Allergy Asthma Proc. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):391-6 - PubMed
- Eur J Pharmacol. 2004 Jan 19;484(1):83-9 - PubMed
- Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2004 Dec;135(4):313-8 - PubMed
- J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16 Suppl 1:3-12 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Feb;96(2):263-77; quiz 277-8, 315 - PubMed
- CNS Drugs. 2012 May 1;26(5):421-34 - PubMed
- Life Sci. 2005 Mar 4;76(16):1787-94 - PubMed
- J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Jul;130(1):122-7.e8 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Jul;89(1):38-45 - PubMed
- Am J Med. 2002 Dec 16;113 Suppl 9A:38S-46S - PubMed
- Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):3-9 - PubMed
- Int J Biometeorol. 2012 Jan;56(1):183-94 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 May;96(5):687-91 - PubMed
- Eur J Pharmacol. 2002 Oct 11;452(3):339-45 - PubMed
- Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):600-8 - PubMed
- Recept Channels. 1998;5(2):99-102 - PubMed
- J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Dec;299(3):908-14 - PubMed
- J Med Chem. 2011 Nov 10;54(21):7602-20 - PubMed
- Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Apr;104(4):293-8 - PubMed
Publication Types