Display options
Cite
Lloyd-Jones TJ, Nakabayashi K. Long-term repetition priming and semantic interference in a lexical-semantic matching task: tapping the links between object names and colors. Front Psychol. 2014;5:644doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644.
Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Nakabayashi, K. (2014). Long-term repetition priming and semantic interference in a lexical-semantic matching task: tapping the links between object names and colors. Frontiers in psychology, 5644. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644
Lloyd-Jones, Toby J, and Nakabayashi, Kazuyo. "Long-term repetition priming and semantic interference in a lexical-semantic matching task: tapping the links between object names and colors." Frontiers in psychology vol. 5 (2014): 644. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644
Lloyd-Jones TJ, Nakabayashi K. Long-term repetition priming and semantic interference in a lexical-semantic matching task: tapping the links between object names and colors. Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25009522; PMCID: PMC4068293.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644. eCollection 2014.

Long-term repetition priming and semantic interference in a lexical-semantic matching task: tapping the links between object names and colors.

Frontiers in psychology

Toby J Lloyd-Jones, Kazuyo Nakabayashi

Affiliations

  1. Wales Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Swansea University Swansea, UK.
  2. Department of Psychology, University of Hull Hull, UK.

PMID: 25009522 PMCID: PMC4068293 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00644

Abstract

Using a novel paradigm to engage the long-term mappings between object names and the prototypical colors for objects, we investigated the retrieval of object-color knowledge as indexed by long-term priming (the benefit in performance from a prior encounter with the same or a similar stimulus); a process about which little is known. We examined priming from object naming on a lexical-semantic matching task. In the matching task participants encountered a visually presented object name (Experiment 1) or object shape (Experiment 2) paired with either a color patch or color name. The pairings could either match whereby both were consistent with a familiar object (e.g., strawberry and red) or mismatch (strawberry and blue). We used the matching task to probe knowledge about familiar objects and their colors pre-activated during object naming. In particular, we examined whether the retrieval of object-color information was modality-specific and whether this influenced priming. Priming varied with the nature of the retrieval process: object-color priming arose for object names but not object shapes and beneficial effects of priming were observed for color patches whereas inhibitory priming arose with color names. These findings have implications for understanding how object knowledge is retrieved from memory and modified by learning.

Keywords: color; memory; modality-specific; name; object; repetition priming; semantic interference; shape

References

  1. Percept Psychophys. 1999 Aug;61(6):1140-53 - PubMed
  2. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):101-44 - PubMed
  3. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):723-61 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jul;107(3):460-99 - PubMed
  5. J Child Lang. 1999 Feb;26(1):23-47 - PubMed
  6. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60 - PubMed
  7. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):310-22 - PubMed
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):646-53 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Bull. 1998 Jan;123(1):71-99 - PubMed
  10. Memory. 1995 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):535-86 - PubMed
  11. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75 - PubMed
  12. Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):606-24 - PubMed
  13. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1372-84 - PubMed
  14. Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):441-52 - PubMed
  15. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1989 Nov;41(4):797-827 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 - PubMed
  17. Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):18-35 - PubMed
  18. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Dec;8(6):757-77 - PubMed
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):765-76 - PubMed
  20. Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):227-52 - PubMed
  21. Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2218-25 - PubMed
  22. Cognition. 2006 Jul;100(3):464-82 - PubMed
  23. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jan;64(1):122-45 - PubMed
  24. Cognition. 1993 Aug;48(2):121-37 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Sci. 2012 Apr;23(4):364-9 - PubMed
  26. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan;8(1):49-55 - PubMed
  27. Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):816-36 - PubMed
  28. Perception. 2003;32(6):667-80 - PubMed
  29. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):244-53 - PubMed
  30. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Oct;97(1):1-6 - PubMed
  31. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):35-47 - PubMed
  32. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Oct;97(1):95-127 - PubMed
  33. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jun;4(6):662-7 - PubMed
  34. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Jul;56(5):779-802 - PubMed
  35. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89 - PubMed
  36. Br J Psychol. 2001 Aug;92(Pt 3):483-506 - PubMed
  37. Brain Cogn. 2012 Feb;78(1):28-37 - PubMed
  38. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1994 May;47(2):331-64 - PubMed
  39. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):170-86 - PubMed
  40. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 May;21(3):785-94 - PubMed
  41. J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):59-70 - PubMed
  42. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 May;58(4):667-92 - PubMed
  43. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;121(9):1473-1480 - PubMed
  44. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48550 - PubMed

Publication Types