Display options
Share it on

Proteome Sci. 2014 Jun 25;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-12-35. eCollection 2014.

Comparative secretome analysis of Streptomyces scabiei during growth in the presence or absence of potato suberin.

Proteome science

Doaa Komeil, Rebeca Padilla-Reynaud, Sylvain Lerat, Anne-Marie Simao-Beaunoir, Carole Beaulieu

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, El-Shatby 21545, Egypt.
  2. Centre SÈVE, Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada.

PMID: 25028574 PMCID: PMC4098958 DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-12-35

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suberin is a recalcitrant plant biopolymer composed of a polyphenolic and a polyaliphatic domain. Although suberin contributes to a significant portion of soil organic matter, the biological process of suberin degradation is poorly characterized. It has been suggested that Streptomyces scabiei, a plant pathogenic bacterium, can produce suberin-degrading enzymes. In this study, a comparative analysis of the S. scabiei secretome from culture media supplemented or not with potato suberin was carried out to identify enzymes that could be involved in suberin degradation.

METHODS: S. scabiei was grown in the presence of casein only or in the presence of both casein and suberin. Extracellular proteins from 1-, 3- and 5-day-old supernatants were analyzed by LC-MS/MS to determine their putative functions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed to monitor the expression level of genes encoding several proteins potentially involved in suberin degradation.

RESULTS: The effect of suberin on the extracellular protein profile of S. scabiei strain has been analyzed. A total of 246 proteins were found to be common in the data sets from both casein medium (CM) and casein-suberin medium (CSM), whereas 124 and 139 proteins were detected only in CM or CSM, respectively. The identified proteins could be divided into 19 functional groups. Two functional groups of proteins (degradation of aromatic compounds and secondary metabolism) were only associated with the CSM. A high proportion of the proteins found to be either exclusively produced, or overproduced, in presence of suberin were involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Most of the proteins included in the lipid metabolism class have been detected in CSM. Apart from lipid metabolism proteins, other identified proteins, particularly two feruloyl esterases, may also actively participate in the breakdown of suberin architecture. Both feruloyl esterase genes were overexpressed between 30 to 340 times in the presence of suberin.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the presence of suberin in S. scabiei growth medium induced the production of a wide variety of glycosyl hydrolases. Furthermore, this study has allowed the identification of extracellular enzymes that could be involved in the degradation of suberin, including enzymes of the lipid metabolism and feruloyl esterases.

Keywords: Common scab; Feruloyl esterase; Glycosyl hydrolase; Lipid metabolism; Proteomics; Streptomyces scabies; Suberinase

References

  1. Phytochemistry. 2001 Aug;57(7):1115-22 - PubMed
  2. Nat Methods. 2011 Sep 29;8(10):785-6 - PubMed
  3. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 May;35(5):377-391 - PubMed
  4. Anal Biochem. 1972 May;47(1):273-9 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):631-7 - PubMed
  6. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;75(7):2148-57 - PubMed
  7. Proteomics. 2011 Aug;11(15):3086-105 - PubMed
  8. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Jun;14(3):259-63 - PubMed
  9. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):29-34 - PubMed
  10. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W429-32 - PubMed
  11. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 15;31(22):6633-9 - PubMed
  12. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002 Nov;66(11):2347-55 - PubMed
  13. J Basic Microbiol. 2010 Dec;50 Suppl 1:S30-6 - PubMed
  14. Lipids. 1974 Sep;9(9):645-50 - PubMed
  15. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009 Oct;8(10):2396-403 - PubMed
  16. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004 Mar 15;271(2):507-10 - PubMed
  17. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008 Nov;9(6):753-62 - PubMed
  18. J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Nov;48(11):5476-83 - PubMed
  19. Can J Microbiol. 2013 May;59(5):294-303 - PubMed
  20. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4098 - PubMed
  21. Acta Biol Hung. 2010 Sep;61(3):322-32 - PubMed
  22. J Exp Bot. 2013 Aug;64(11):3225-36 - PubMed
  23. Plant J. 2010 Apr;62(2):277-90 - PubMed
  24. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  25. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 02;6:167 - PubMed
  26. Mol Microbiol. 2002 Aug;45(4):943-50 - PubMed
  27. Phytopathology. 2010 Jan;100(1):91-6 - PubMed
  28. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Jun;64(6):763-81 - PubMed
  29. J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Jul 24;61(29):7038-47 - PubMed
  30. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45 - PubMed
  31. Macromol Biosci. 2007 Feb 12;7(2):128-35 - PubMed
  32. Anal Chem. 1996 Mar 1;68(5):850-8 - PubMed
  33. Mol Microbiol. 2010 Jul 1;77(1):252-71 - PubMed
  34. BMC Microbiol. 2005 Oct 07;5:58 - PubMed
  35. Mol Microbiol. 2009 Sep;73(5):898-912 - PubMed
  36. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D396-400 - PubMed
  37. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D277-80 - PubMed
  38. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Jan;1774(1):112-20 - PubMed
  39. Microbes Environ. 2012;27(1):36-42 - PubMed
  40. Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):527-533 - PubMed
  41. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;24(3):431-42 - PubMed
  42. Anal Chem. 2003 Mar 15;75(6):1300-6 - PubMed
  43. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D490-5 - PubMed

Publication Types