Display options
Share it on

Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:646230. doi: 10.1155/2014/646230. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

Do improvements in balance relate to improvements in long-distance walking function after stroke?.

Stroke research and treatment

Louis N Awad, Darcy S Reisman, Stuart A Binder-Macleod

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713, USA ; Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
  2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713, USA ; Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, Newark, DE 19713, USA ; Delaware Clinical and Translational Research Accel Program, Newark, DE 19713, USA.

PMID: 25120939 PMCID: PMC4121191 DOI: 10.1155/2014/646230

Abstract

Stroke survivors identify a reduced capacity to walk farther distances as a factor limiting their engagement at home and in community. Previous observational studies have shown that measures of balance ability and balance self-efficacy are strong predictors of long-distance walking function after stroke. Consequently, recommendations to target balance during rehabilitation have been put forth. The purpose of this study was to determine if the changes in balance and long-distance walking function observed following a 12-week poststroke walking rehabilitation program were related. For thirty-one subjects with hemiparesis after stroke, this investigation explored the cross-sectional (i.e., before training) and longitudinal (i.e., changes due to intervention) relationships between measures of standing balance, walking balance, and balance self-efficacy versus long-distance walking function as measured via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). A regression model containing all three balance variables accounted for 60.8% of the variance in 6MWT performance (adj R (2) = .584; F(3,27) = 13.931; P < .001); however, only dynamic balance (FGA) was an independent predictor (β = .502) of 6MWT distance. Interestingly, changes in balance were unrelated to changes in the distance walked (each correlation coefficient <.17, P > .05). For persons after stroke similar to those studied, improving balance may not be sufficient to improve long-distance walking function.

References

  1. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(3):246-50 - PubMed
  2. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;89(6):497-504 - PubMed
  3. Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):2021-5 - PubMed
  4. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;93(10):1782-7 - PubMed
  5. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Feb 18;27(4):156-63 - PubMed
  6. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):649-60 - PubMed
  7. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Oct;40(9):721-6 - PubMed
  8. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):340-6 - PubMed
  9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;94(5):856-62 - PubMed
  10. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36 - PubMed
  11. PM R. 2012 Mar;4(3):165-70 - PubMed
  12. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1101-7 - PubMed
  13. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 May;35(10):860-7 - PubMed
  14. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):115-9 - PubMed
  15. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):258-68 - PubMed
  16. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;39(4):439-44 - PubMed
  17. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008 May-Jun;24(3):195-204 - PubMed
  18. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):840-8 - PubMed
  19. Stroke. 2002 Mar;33(3):756-61 - PubMed
  20. Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;84(10):906-18 - PubMed
  21. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34 - PubMed
  22. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23-24):2291-8 - PubMed
  23. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999 Nov;15(4):833-55 - PubMed
  24. Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):982-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support