Display options
Share it on

J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 09;40:149-59. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0017. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.

Profile, correlation and structure of speed in youth elite soccer players.

Journal of human kinetics

Malý Tomáš, Zahálka František, Malá Lucia, Teplan Jaroslav

Affiliations

  1. Sport Research Centre, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague,.

PMID: 25031683 PMCID: PMC4096104 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0017

Abstract

Speed, power and agility are important components of fitness and determine the level of success and performance in soccer. The aim of this study was to identify speed variables and to determine their mutual correlation and structure in youth elite soccer players. The research group consisted of players from the Czech U16 national team (n = 22, age = 15.6 ± 0.4 years). Speed variables were assessed using the following tests: a) linear speed: 5 m sprint (S5), 10 m sprint (S10) and 20 m flying sprint (F20); b) the agility: agility test 505 with turning on the dominant (A505D) and non-dominant legs (A505N) and the K-test (K) and c) ball velocity after an instep kick with the dominant (IKD) and non-dominant (IKN) legs. Significant dependence was found for S5 compared with S10, F20 vs. A505N, K vs. A505N (p < 0.01) and S10 vs. F20 (p < 0.05). The factor analysis revealed three components of the latent variable - speed. The first component consisted of linear sprint (S10, S20) and also partially consisted of maximum speed (F20). The second component was primarily composed of agility (A505D, A505N, K) and also included maximum speed (F20). The third independent component represented ball velocity after an instep kick (IKD, IKN). The speed variables in youth elite players exhibited significant heterogeneity from the perspective of performance, as determined by the monitored tests. The structure of the speed predisposition indicated that there were three components of speed. The results of our studies support the notion that each component of speed must be considered independently when designing training programmes.

Keywords: agility; performance; predisposition; sprint; testing

References

  1. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1192-6 - PubMed
  2. J Sports Sci. 2003 Jul;21(7):519-28 - PubMed
  3. J Sports Sci. 2005 Jun;23(6):601-18 - PubMed
  4. Int J Sports Med. 2010 May;31(5):304-10 - PubMed
  5. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(7):625-31 - PubMed
  6. Coll Antropol. 2007 Sep;31(3):787-93 - PubMed
  7. Int J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;29(8):668-74 - PubMed
  8. J Sports Sci. 2000 Sep;18(9):669-83 - PubMed
  9. J Sports Sci. 2006 May;24(5):529-41 - PubMed
  10. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009 Mar;49(1):97-104 - PubMed
  11. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1994;619:1-155 - PubMed
  12. J Sports Sci. 2002 Apr;20(4):293-9 - PubMed
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):76-8 - PubMed
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Aug;15(3):315-9 - PubMed
  15. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002 Jun;42(2):239-42 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):46-52 - PubMed
  17. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Aug;27(8):2134-40 - PubMed
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1285-92 - PubMed
  19. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Feb;33(2):326-33 - PubMed
  20. J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Mar 01;6(1):63-70 - PubMed
  21. J Sports Sci. 2000 Sep;18(9):695-702 - PubMed
  22. J Sports Sci. 2011 Mar;29(5):477-84 - PubMed
  23. Int J Sports Med. 2001 Jan;22(1):45-51 - PubMed
  24. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1046-50 - PubMed
  25. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Apr;24(4):936-41 - PubMed
  26. Sports Med. 2005;35(6):501-36 - PubMed
  27. J Hum Kinet. 2012 Mar;31:149-58 - PubMed
  28. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1383-90 - PubMed

Publication Types